Conferences
@laurenperkins @ckieff - A #Digiday Unconference
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 09/16/2010 - 08:49Tuesday, I attended the Digiday Social Conference and ended up engaging in a metadiscussion with @laurenperkins and @ckieff about the conference. I suggested a #digiday unconference, but the idea is probably too big to fit into 140 characters, so I'm explaining it here.
Let me start off by providing bits of background. DM2 Media produces a series of conferences around digital publishing, media. and marketing called Digiday. There is Digiday Social, Digiday Mobile, Digiday Apps, Digiday Target and probably a few others that I am forgetting right now. They tend to overlap a fair amount. After all targeted social media campaigns using mobile apps are an important part of where digital publishing, media. and marketing is going.
I attend, and write about many of the Digiday conferences and often have great discussions with Chris Kieff about them on Twitter and during the networking breaks.
About half way through Digiday Social, Lauren Perkins asked Chris, "What do you think of @digiday so far?" Chris replied, "not bad, there is some substance this time. I'm pleased with the lack of 2 year old references. You?" One particular two year old reference that Chris was referring to was Motrin Moms. He tweeted about how glad he was that they made it through the conference without a reference to Motrin's famous social media fail.
Lauren replied, "Was hoping to hear more about where we as an industry go next - how we are going to use innovation". I'm with Lauren. I would love to have some good discussions about where we go next. Chris responded, "That discussion happens behind closed doors and costs more money... :) "
The discussion meandered on and Lauren said, "I would say that #digiday has great speakers but a lot of the content is for those who are not engrossed in it every day". I think Lauren was right about that, but there is some value to speaking to newbies. As I see it, Digiday is an opportunity to help new people learn about the value of social, mobile, targeted apps and related strategies.
I jumped in and suggested "A digiday unconference might be really interesting." Lauren replied, " interesting.... what do you propose for an un @digiday event?"
I am a big fan of unconferences and regular readers of my blog will recall discussions about Podcamps; unconferences about podcasting and social media. The Podcamps I've attended tend to be mostly aimed at individual content creators, and not at people in the marketing and media worlds. A Podcamp aimed at those in the biz might be really interesting.
Podcamps are unconferences that grew out of barcamps, which are unconferences in the Open Space Technology tradition. They are typically free, or have a minimal cost.
Wikipedia defines an unconference as a "facilitated, participant-driven conference centered on a theme or purpose". My experiences with unconferences have been that they are great for emerging topics. The day before Digiday Social, Peggy Holman's new book, Engaging Emergence: Turning Upheaval into Opportunity came out. I've attended unconferences facilitated by Peggy and she is a master at it and her book is one that people interested in emerging trends, such as social, mobile, targeted apps and related strategies should read.
Good unconferences, in my opinion, should be brainstorming sessions, without product pitches. Powerpoint presentations are a good way to lose an audience at an unconference. In many ways, it seems like a good social marketing strategy should be very similar to an unconference. It should listen to the audience and engage them. It should encourage user generated content.
I suspect the fear that many brands have of a social media campaign, "What if someone says something bad about my brand or does something inappropriate?" is very similar to the fear that people have of unconferences. People like to be in control, whether it be of the marketing campaign or the conference experience, but the big wins come when people give up a little bit of control and let something exciting and perhaps even viral emerge.
So, what would a #digiday unconference be like? Imagine DM2 Media gathering some of the best and the brightest in the worlds of social, mobile, targetted, and apps in a large room. Everyone would get a brief moment to introduce themselves and suggest a topic or two that they are interested in. The organizers would gather up the topics and arrange them to be in breakout rooms. There would be no presenter and no pitches Instead, there would be a moderator and a note taker. Probably the best note taking would be done via twitter. Everyone would participate, sharing ideas, experiences and passions.
To the extent that a sponsor wanted something specific about their products, sessions could be included where people would sit around and talk about the products. The sponsor would be well advised to provide a very brief, "this is what the product is" introduction, followed by a chance for users to share experiences and prospects to ask questions or share ideas of things they would like to do with the product. It would be like a good social campaign targeted at users and potential users.
Broader topics could also be explored, such as "What is the future of Apps?" Instead of listening to three or four sages on the stage talk about it, a lot of interesting new ideas could emerge from the participants.
So, what do you say? Anyone up for UnDigiday?
#digiday - Gamifying The News
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 09/15/2010 - 09:13One of the most interesting comments from Digiday Social conference in New York City on Tuesday was that more people play social games, like Farmville, than read the newspaper. I haven't found a source to back up this comment or to get details about exactly who they are counting, or how, but on the surface, it is frightening. More people seem more concerned about acquiring fictitious grapes from a fictitious farm stand than about acquiring information that is necessary for our democracy to thrive. Perhaps the politician seeking to get elected would do better seeking ad placements in social games than they would be in participating in debates.
Yet perhaps there is a glimmer of hope from the Digiday Mobile conference for the future of journalism coming in the form of a neologism. The emerging buzzword of the conference was "Gamification". A San Francisco startup calledGamify defines the verb gamify, as "Applying game mechanics to bring fun and engagement where needed." Perhaps it is sorely needed to bring fun and engagement back to the news industry.
A few years ago, I participated in some "Play The News" games where participants would read up on a news story and make predictions about how it would turn out. As an example, people might read up on the primaries that happened last night, and make predictions about the outcomes. Will Christine O'Donnell and Karl Rove make nice? Will she win the general election? People who follow the news would be expected to perform better in this game. With game mechanics in place to track who is doing the best, people will feel encouraged to participate.
Unfortunately, this was a couple years ago, before social gaming really took off and I don't know whatever happened to the game. Another site that I've always been interested in is NewsTrust. This site crowdsources efforts to find quality journalism. They base their results not on gaming the news the way people do at Digg or Reddit, but on aspects of whether the story has multiple sources, anonymous sources, uses purple language, only presents one side of the story, and other means of judging the quality of a news story. You could review reviewers as well and see how well each reviewer was doing. They are on their way to gamification.
Of course, NPR listeners are likely to think of Wait, Wait... Don't Tell Me!, the NPR news quiz show. They have done a great job of gamification of the news. However, a social media game for listeners to play along at home could take this to a whole new level.
So, it may be frightening that more people play social games than read newspapers. On the other hand, it might be a great opportunity to encourage greater understanding of what is going on around us and greater civic engagement by gamifying the news.
#Digiday Social and Gestalt Blogging
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 09/14/2010 - 07:41What am I doing, sitting on a 6:56 AM train to New York City writing a blog post on my cellphone? That is what I asl myself as the fine fall morning slips quickly by my train window, punctuated by red spikes of sumack.
Yesterday was a frustrating day. The spam filter on my server failed bringing everything to a crawl. I had hoped to go into the city yesterday as well, but between feeling rundown, having server problems, having some family logistical issues, and dealing with the foster puppies, that just didn't happen.
I am way behind on my emails and hoped that at least I could catch up on them a little. No luck. I did get a chance to respond to a couple PR requests and pursue a job lead a little bit. I took some time to research some articles. I watched a mailing list struggle as members left because other members wouldn't stay on task. All of this is good blog fodder, but it leaves me further behind.
So what does all of this have to do with #digiday social and gestalt blogging and why have I taken so long to get to my point? Don't I remember the rule about not buring my lede?
One of the emails I responded to yesterday was from a communications director who questioned if I deserved press credentials from her organization. While most organizations are all too eager to grant me press credentials, I still run into this from time to time and it still bugs me.
I can understand some of it. I write in my own style, often using the first person and often avoiding the conventions of the AP style guide. At the same time, I shun some of the conventional wisdom about blogging. I do not limit myself to a single niche.
This finally gets me to my point. One niche I like to write about is digital advertising and marketting, not something political bloggers often write about, although I think they should. When you get to social marketting, it becomes all the more complicated.
While some people try to segment their online lives; Facebook for family and friends, LinkedIn for business contacts and Twitter and other sites for random noise, our real lives are notso neat. We see co-workers at church. We run into former classmates at PTO meetings. We try to integrate our lives as much as possible..
The brand that is launching a social campaign would be well advised to pay attention to this, especially if they are seeking that digital holy grail of marketing, viralness.
A campaign goes viral when people take it across the artificial boundaries of our lives. It happens when someone shares a link at work on Facebook with their friends after hearing about it at the water cooler.
Will the folks at digiday social get this and talk about it? Hard to tell. Will the communications directors for various organizations get? We'll see. What about the political operatives? Let us hope so.
The train continues rolling towards New York City. The sumac is being replaced by graffiti. Perhaps that, also, is a metaphor about what is happening in social marketting, but that's a different post.
#pcct - What Makes for a Good Podcamp Session?
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 08/03/2010 - 09:19Recently, a discussion came up amongst organizers of PodcampCT about different sessions ideas and what makes for a good session. I’ve always felt that a good podcamp is one where everyone learns something. It is one where there are not sales pitches or presentations. Instead, everyone is an equal participant. Everyone is a rock star. One submission particularly caught the attention of a few people.
Title: You Are The Media & The Message
Summary: Whether you are an experienced social networker or just getting your first blog or podcast off the ground, you can be as influential as any media outlet in the state. Learn how to leverage "the brand of you" through various media, both new and old, to get whatever you want to get done from some media mavens who will share some secrets to help you to use the new trust agents to grow your tribes, make it stick and crush it.
Various members of the organizing group felt that this sounded a bit like a sales pitch or presentation. It would probably be a winner on a social media buzz word bingo game card. It talked about ‘media mavens sharing secrets’. Others noted that the person who made the submission is very keen and progressive about social media, but that it did sound a bit like a presentation which might cause people to not attend, or to exercise the rule of two feet.
For people not experienced in Podcamps, the rule of two feet is that if you are in a session that just isn’t doing it for you, you should use your two feet to walk out and find a session that fits your needs better. You will get more out of the sessions this way, and people in a session may have a better session than they would if people are resentfully sitting in the session. When I am at a session that smacks of a presentation, I check to see if there is a chance to turn it into a conversation, and lacking that, I use the rule of two feet.
Yet actually, the session idea might not be as bad as it looks on first glance. If anything, it seemed to have the problem of combining many great potential session ideas. Key session ideas that I picked out of the one submission included:
How to brand yourself.
Participants will explore the idea of what it means to have a "personal brand"; why you might want one, and how you might establish one.Building audience and influence:
Participants will share ideas about how to get more followers and readers, especially followers and readers that are most likely to act on and/or repeat messages sent out via social media.Citizen journalism:
Participants will explore what it means to be a citizen journalist; how to cover stories that are being missed by others, how to get press credentials, how to tell the story in a way that people will be interested in.
I also suggested an idea to encourage people to suggest sessions that are not presentations. It seems like a good idea submission form might include a question something like
What do you hope to learn from this session?
Every session should be one that everyone attending is hoping to learn something from. If there aren't
things you are hoping to learn from this session, then perhaps someone else should moderate it.
That said, I also had a snarky suggestion:
Title: How to avoid pitches and presentations at podcamp
Summary: Podcamp is an opportunity to share ideas. Unfortunately, some people view it as an opportunity to make a sales pitch or presentation. They miss great opportunities to learn. This session will help participants recognize potential sales pitches and presentations to avoid, use the rule of two feet when they find themselves in such a session, and think about how they can promote sessions that will be meaningful discussions instead of presentations.
Podcamps are wonderful chances to share ideas and learn new things about podcasting and social media. PodcampCT will take place in New Haven on October 16th. If you live in the Connecticut area, please consider attending. If you live further away, please check out the main Podcamp website to find a Podcamp near you.
#swforce A Perpetual Virtual CityCamp?
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 07/26/2010 - 20:32Tuesday morning will see the second meeting of those interested in establishing a Social Web Task Force for the City of New Haven. I’ve written a little bit about this in #swct Social Media and Civic Involvement Redux and Embracing the Untaskforce, Social Media and Civic Involvement - #swct. Andre Yap wrote about this in The New Haven Project: 100 Common Visions in 100 Days and Brandon Jackson has written about this in New Haven 2.0. Now, we need to start fleshing out what this really means.