Media

Media

Follow Friday

@cooljustice @connpost @ctnewsjunkie @valleyindy @wherewelive @colinmcenroe @senchrisdodd @stsengarylebeau @ct94dem @hynes2000 @joecascio @jcnork @gideonstrumpet @lastchancect @clairesnewhaven

This week, I’m going to do something a little different. Andy Thibault, who writes the Cool Justice Blog has recently joined Twitter, as have a few other friends from here in Connecticut, so I’m writing this blog post to welcome Andy and the others and to help give them a feel for what Twitter is really all about.

The boring geeky way would be to talk about who interesting people to follow are, which is partly what I’m doing here and to talk about how to get your own message out on Twitter, which I’ll do a little bit of here and a little bit of later on.

I use a site called TwitterFeed. Twitter feed takes the RSS feed of my blog and posts the title, the first several words, and a link to my blog on my Twitter Stream. It is fairly easy to set up, and if you have a blog, like Andy does, you should really set up Twitter Feed to tweet your blog posts.

In addition, I use the Facebook application for Twitter. Once you set up your profile, you can get it to take your tweets, or messages on Twitter and add them to your Facebook status. So, when my blog post goes live, it will show up on Twitter, and some people may come to the blog that way. It will then show up on Facebook, and may follow the link there and add comments.

But enough being a boring geek for a little bit. I believe that a better way to understand twitter is to think of it as a conversation at a party; some of it inane, some of it profound, all of it providing tidbits of information. You can listen to whichever groups of people you want. Once you’ve listened for a while and you get a sense of the conversations, you join in.

I tried to think of what party might best describe the folks I listen to on Twitter from Connecticut and it struck me that the best example might be at some important opening of a Connecticut college radio station.

I remember when I was much younger, hanging out at the college radio station. In one corner was the teletype. It could type at a whopping 11 characters a second, so mostly we just saw headlines coming in. Some of us less social and more geeky folks would gather around the teletype and see what was coming in and carry on stilted conversations about what we were reading.

So, the first group of people on Twitter I will highlight are the local news outlets. @connpost, @rep_am, @bristolpress, @hartfordcourant lead the pack. Oh, here’s a good point to make a jab at the Hartford Courant and explain another part of Twitter etiquette. When someone says something interesting, you ReTweet it. The proper way to retweet something is start your message with RT meaning ReTweet. Then, attribute it by putting the tweeters id.

As an example, if I wanted to ReTweet a headline from the Bristol press, I might say something like:

RT @BristolPress BRISTOLPRESS.COM GOP candidate: can't afford the house: BRISTOL — The city should abandon ..http://bit.ly/uJpEj. Even in Twitter, it is important to give proper attribution.

Besides the traditional big name news outlets, the weekly alternatives are there, @hrtfordadvocate, @nwhavenadvocate, and the @fairfieldweekly. There is a college newspaper there, @therecorder. The new news sites, like the Valley Independent @valleyindy and CTNews Junkie @ctnewsjunkie are there, and there is public radio, @wherewelive.

Connecticut Public Radio’s newest celebrity, @colinmcenroe is passed out in the corner somewhere, probably because of too much vodka, nutella and opium. He hasn’t posted since January but hopefully Chion Wolf can get him back on the straight and narrow.

@ctnewsjunkie doesn’t post that often on Twitter, probably because she is busy running between various political figures on Twitter and busy with her own news site. @senchrisdodd, @stsengarylebeau and @ct94dem are busy holding on their discussions. @stsengarylebeau is new to twitter and has approached it like a typical politician busy talking but not really interacting with anyone on Twitter yet. Our elder statesman, @senchrisdodd has learned that he needs to more in touch with the voters in Connecticut, and while he doesn’t interact with others via twitter either, it does feel a little bit more connected. State Representative Gary Holder-Winfield, @ct94dem, does the best job with interacting with constituents and others by replying to other people’s tweets and retweeting ones that he finds particularly interesting.

As a side note, replying to someone on Twitter is just like retweeting, except that you don’t start off with an RT. So, if I wanted to reply to something Gary said, I might type

@ct94dem Great Job!

Besides the politicians, there are others that are at the party to get their message out. For example, @lastchancect posts messages about pets that will be put to sleep at various shelters if they are not adopted soon. I like to retweet @lastchancect because what they are doing is so important. It also helps that they thank people who retweet them, which is a great way of finding other interesting people as well as being found yourself. The same applies to @clairesnewhaven. I must admit that I’m not a regular there, but my wife the foodie, @khynes2000 assures that I’ve enjoyed food from their store and it is great.

Yet a key part of any party are just the regular people that are there. A few of my good Connecticut friends that I try to engage in conversation on twitter as often as possible are @sheilamc7, @joecascio, and @jcnork. @gideonstrumpet and @paulbogush are two of the most important Connecticut people to listen to on Twitter. @gideonstrumpet is a public defender and offers great insights on the legal system. @paulbogush is a teacher and provides equally great insights on the educational system.

Two more shoutouts before I move to the next part. @shelisrael and @missrogue. They have written the two best books I’ve found yet which go into more details about Twitter and social media, The Whuffie Factor and Twitterville.

In Twitterville, @shelisrael talks about people live tweeting events. Go to an event, and tweet interesting parts. The way to make all your tweets mix together nicely with everyone else at the event is to use an agreed upon hashtag. A hashtag is simply a word or acronym preceded by a hashmark. Various tools combine all of these posts together, either by a simple search or with a more sophisticated tool. Tweeting events, including a hash tag, and seeing who else is tweeting the same event can build great new friendships on Twitter.

With that, let me do a final shoutout to @shhhe. She is a key voice behind #peoplebrowsr which is one of many tools that I find particularly useful in sorting and organizing different streams of information coming at me from Twitter.

To close, let me mention Follow Friday. Follow Friday is a popular means of telling others about who you follow, or at least whom you think others should follow. It also provides a great way to start getting involved with Twitter. Follow people that your friends recommend on Follow Friday, or simply check out whom they are following and see if any of them are your friends. Slowly, you’ll find a good people to follow and interact with, and if you have interesting things to say, they’ll follow you back.

So, that’s my follow Friday for this week. I hope you enjoyed it and I hope all my U.S. friends have a great Labor Day Weekend.

Covering the Local News

Last night, I went to the ribbon cutting for the Kucinskas loop at Beecher Road School in Woodbridge CT which was followed by an Ice Cream Social run as a fundraiser by the local Parent Teachers Organization. There were a couple of reporters local weekly papers there for the ribbon cutting. I’m not sure if they will talk about PTO Ice Cream Social. The day before, I attended the Woodbridge Commision on the Use of Publicly Owned Property meeting. I was there to hear if they had anything to say about the most recently purchased property by the town of Woodbridge, the Woodbridge Country Club, and, if the opportunity presented itself add some comments of my own about the club. When I get a chance, I hope to write up a blog post or two about these events.

This gets to a problem with volunteer citizen journalism. Volunteer citizen journalists, no matter what their level of experience and professionalism, only cover things that they are interested in when they have time to do it. There is a lot of other local news that volunteer citizen journalists might not have time or interest to cover that really needs to be covered. This is where we especially need professional journalists.

Yet this costs money, and news organizations are cutting reporters left and right. With fewer reporters, news organizations need to find other ways to gather news. Recently, the Hartford Courant has started using more material from other newspapers. Some people call this aggregation. Others call it plagiarism or theft.

James Smith of the New Britain Herald wrote:

It has even taken to stealing our stories with no attribution. Sometimes it will credit The Bristol Press or The Herald and re-print our articles both on its Web site and its “print platform.” Sometimes, and this is most troubling, our coverage will appear virtually word for word, but in a shorter version with no credit.

That’s called plagiarism, a fireable offense in any newsroom, as egregious as pandering to advertisers.

The once mighty Courant has been reduced to copying from its smaller competition.

Let me make a few observations. I have just copied text from Mr. Smith’s opinion piece. I have credited him, and since I’m writing online, I am providing a link back to his column. This is based on what we were taught to do back in high school. If someone writes something important, quote it and attribute it.

This sort of quoting is well within the area of “fair use”. A lot of people argue about what constitutes “fair use”. So, I thought it would be useful to quote what the U.S. Code, Chapter 17, Section 107 has to say:

In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

The fourth point is particularly interesting to me, what is the effect on the market. Hopefully, people that read my blog post will find what Mr. Smith says interesting and go read the rest of his column. I somehow suspect this isn’t the intention of the Hartford Courant when they copy large portions of other newspapers articles.

Rick Green, who writes for the Hartford Courant responds in his blog, “Jim knows as well as anyone that TV, radio, small and big papers and the AP have been doing this for years.” (Again, note the attribution, the link and the limited amount of material copied). This resulted in quite a long set of comments. I guess it all comes down to what “this” is. Fair use quoting of limited amounts of information with proper attribution has been going on for years and should continue going on. If anything, we should see more of it online.

However, lifting major portions of articles, even with attribution is where the Courant steps over the line. In a later blog post, Mr. Green reprints the Society for Professional Journalists’ release SPJ Ethics Committee: Hartford Courant Violated Ethical Standards:

Many media outlets aggregate information online, summarizing a story and then linking to the original. The Courant failed to carry the credit from its online version to its print version.

"However it happened, the Courant violated fundamental standards," said Andy Schotz, the chairman of SPJ's Ethics Committee. "This was theft."

Mr. Green focuses on the first paragraph about many media outlets aggregating information online and glosses over the second paragraph stating that the Courant violated fundamental standards. Yes, aggregation happens all the time. When done properly, it improves the news eco-system. When done improperly it is an ethical violation called theft. As an additional side note, Mr. Green did not provide a link to the release from the SPJ and the text was provided as an image which means it cannot be searched or easily copied into other articles.

To bring it back to the aspect of local news and acceptable aggregation, I have an agreement with the Journal Inquirer. The title and link to my blog posts about politics shows up in the opinion section of their online site. I include headlines and links to their stories in the Connecticut section of my blog. I believe it is our mutual hope that this will result in more people reading both websites.

The editor of the Journal Inquirer, Chris Powell, wrote and editorial entitled Local news is costly, so Courant rips it off. It puts the whole issue into the proper context.

Local news organizations are struggling to provide the news that we as citizens need to know but that volunteer citizen journalists do not cover as completely as should be covered. There are many great ways for volunteer citizen journalists and local news organizations to work together to make sure we all get all the information we need. Then, there is the approach that the Hartford Courant adopted.

(Categories: )

The Kindle: A Viable Platform for Local News Organizations? Not Likely.

Since the advent of electronic paper, analysts have written about the potential of this technology to save local newspapers. Amazon’s introduction of the Kindle added to these discussions. However, it is worth taking a closer look.

Back in May, Engadget reported that “Amazon takes 70 percent of Kindle newspaper revenues”. Yet still, you can find the larger papers, like the New York Times, Washington Post, and Boston Globe on Kindle. The question is, even with the excessive cut that Amazon takes, can it be a viable platform for smaller local papers. A quick search for Connecticut papers did not turn up any.

Yet Amazon has introduced a new product that has potential to bring smaller news sites online. Kindle Publishing for Blogs is currently available in beta. Just about any blogger can go to the website and get their blog listed. Amazon will charge 99 cents for a monthly subscription to the blog and like with newspapers, keep 70%. I know quite a few bloggers that have set their blog up on Kindle this way, but know of none that have received any revenues yet.

I discussed this with a group of journalists focusing on emerging trends in journalism. The group is made up of professors, journalists at online sites as well as journalists working for traditional organizations. None had used Kindle publishing. One editor who runs a very successful online news site published in blog format expressed a concern about using Kindle Publisher for Blogs. She did not want her site “to be sequestered off in ‘blogland’”. She asked if there was some way to get the folks at Amazon to consider sites like hers for the Kindle.

I sent a request to Kindle Blog Publishing Team, which was one of the few addresses I could find for people working with the Kindle at Amazon asking about this. The response I received was that there was “a different team who work for news content on Kindle”. This was no surprise, and I had hoped that I would be given the contact information for that team, or had my request forwarded to that team.

Instead, they asked for a specific query from the editor which they would then forward to the news content team. I sent a follow-up asking if they could send me the contact information since I am dealing with several online news sites. They responded that they are not able to share contact information for the news team. I sent yet another follow-up urging them to reconsider their request and perhaps forward my response onward. I have not yet heard back from them.

Today, the Examiner has an article stating Ereader sales set to explode, but the Kindle may not reign supreme. It notes research by iSuppli claiming that currently Kindle has 45% market share and Sony has 30% of the market.

As the market grows people will look closely at what is available for their ereaders. Amazon, as an online bookstore, is well positioned to provide content. However, their approach towards news organizations may drive more and more content providers to other platforms, which in turn will drive ereader buyers to other platforms.

Ereaders may yet provide a viable platform for local news organizations, however, unless Amazon changes its tune, those ereaders are likely to be provided by someone else.

(Originally published at Digiday:Daily.)

(Categories: )

Progressive Blogs and Citizen Journalists on Kindle

Recently, I've been getting into some discussions about monetizing blogs and specifically about Kindle Publishing. Kindle Publishing allows a blogger to publish their blog on Kindle. It costs 99 cents a month to subscribe to a blog on Kindle, and Amazon returns 30% of that to the blogger.

I've set up Orient Lodge on Kindle but don't have any Kindle subscribers yet. So far, I've found a few other good progressive blogs on Kindle. They include Burnt Orange Nation and Capitol Annex.

In addition, the Center for Independent Media has a strong presence on Kindle, including the Colorado Independent, the Iowa Independent, the Minnesota Independent, the Michigan Messenger, the New Mexico Independent, and the Washington Independent.

So, are you on Kindle? If so, let me know where.

How do you get a blogger to shut up?

As much as public relations officers try to get bloggers to say something positive about the products and services they are promoting, I suspect many of them as themselves how to get bloggers to shut up, especially about negative aspects of the products and services they promote.

It makes me think of the old quip in politics: How do you get a reporters attention? Tell him it is off the record. The more strenuously you try to get a reporter or blogger not to talk about something, the more likely they are to dig a little deeper and talk even more.

I recently ran into this on a project I am working on where the project manager asked me not to send emails about the project, especially ways in which it is being mismanaged. Given the nature of the project, I won’t be writing about it here, but I am actively removing myself from that project.

Here in the Connecticut media, we have recently had an interesting development. George Gombossy, who used to work for the Hartford Courant recently left in a dispute over an article he was writing concerning one of the larger advertisers at the Hartford Courant. It hasn’t shut up Mr. Gombossy. He now writes a blog, CT Watchdog which tells its potential advertisers, “Advertise in this space and you will be treated just as fairly as non-advertisers.”

In addition, Mr. Gombossy spoke about what has gone on with him and the Hartford Courant on Connecticut Public Radio’s show, “Where we live”. I managed to catch portions of the show as I drove from one client to another and it raised many important questions. Of course it explored the issues of what role should an advertiser have over the news that is covered in a paper they advertise on, but it explored many other important questions. What responsibility should a news outlet have for running advertisements that look like they are news articles?

Mr. Gombossy spoke about the different standards that apply to newspapers and blogs, as well as to comments placed on newspaper sites and blogs. He suggested that when people write for a newspaper, they investigate in deeper detail than bloggers typically investigate their stories. There are a few good reasons for this. Reporters are paid to investigate. They have more time and more resources. As such, they also have much more responsibility. For bloggers that are writing on their own free time, most often with no compensation and little resources, they cannot always investigate as deeply as they would like or as paid reporters can.

This brings us to the bigger question of the future of news. Bloggers typically give away their content for free. They may try to get some revenue from advertising or from jobs that come up as a result of their blogging, but it is hard to sustain. The LA Times is reporting that the News Corporation is pushing to create an online news consortium “that would charge for news distributed online and on portable devices -- and potentially stem the rising tide of red ink.”

Unfortunately, unless they can get everyone to play along, people will just change to free news sources, and bloggers, especially those on the left, are unlikely to play along with the News Corporation.

So, where will bloggers as well as hyperlocal journalists, citizen journalists and other independent writers find the resources to support their habit? It is a topic that is often discussed on various mailing lists. One popular approach is various forms of online fundraising. Spot.us is providing a great model where people can contribute to specific investigative reports. I am sure other such efforts will emerge over time. In addition, as bloggers and journalists write on local issues, I expect that hyperlocal advertising, similar to what helped local newspapers so much in the years of yore will emerge with better revenue models for bloggers and journalists.

Whatever ends up being the mechanism the bloggers and journalists use to fund their activities in the future, it is unlikely that large advertisers will manage to convince writers to not write what they are passionate about. Instead, providing quality goods and services seems like a much better way of making sure that more positive stories and less negative stories are circulated, and that is good for everyone.

Syndicate content