Media

Media

Reading Postman at a Democratic Town Committee

(Originally posted at Greater Democracy.)

The words of Neil Postman provides a peculiar juxtaposition to the committee reports of the monthly Woodbridge, CT Democratic Town Committee.

Next month, I will be speaking, in Second Life, to a communications class about the relationship between Second Life and other forms of media, blogs, online Second Life News, online traditional news, and so on. The class will be reading essays on Media Ecology at that point in their class and I hope they will have some good questions.

However, I’m not a communications scholar, and certainly not an expert on Media Ecology. So, I thought I’d try to get up to speed a little bit in preparation. The local library doesn’t have much on Media Ecology. The closest I got was two books by Neil Postman. Neither seems to be specifically about Media Ecology, but they are both interesting books that I’ve long been thinking about reading.

One book is The End of Education : Redefining the Value of School. Some of my friends in Woodbridge are encouraging me to run for Board of Education next year. I have lots of thoughts about education, and this book, together with his Teaching as a Subversive Activity are probably good books for me to read, even though I suspect they may not come up in any school board debates.

Setting that book aside, I thought I would start off with Building a Bridge to the Eighteenth Century. Postman sets the tone for the book with a quote by Randall Jarrell on the dedication page, “Soon we shall know everything the 18th century didn’t know, and nothing it did, and it will be hard to live with us.”

Macomb County MI GOP Chair Sues Bloggers

On September 10th, Eartha Jane Melzer posted an article to The Michigan Messenger, a Center for Independent Media website, entitled Lose your house, lose your vote. Snarky Anderson has now updated an article about this on Blogging for Michigan about a lawsuit that has been filed.

According to Anderson, Melzer’s story ‘was quickly picked up by Detroit's local television stations and soon afterward, by the national cable networks’ and now, the Macomb County GOP Chair is suing the Center for Independent Media, The Michigan Messenger, Melzer and others. ( Macomb County Circuit Court, case number No. 2008-004340-CZ.)

According to James Stewart, the attorney representing the Center for Independent Media, “Carabelli is a ‘public figure’ within the meaning of New York Times v. Sullivan.

According to Anderson:

Stewart called the actual-malice standard an extremely difficult burden to carry. He said that he'd seen Meltzer's notes, and expressed confidence that he could successfully defend the suit. He added that Carabelli and the Michigan GOP had responded to the Messenger story "on a public stage," which was the proper venue for airing an issue such as this, and went on to express his hope that "cooler heads will prevail."

On Wednesday, Robert Cox, founder and president of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) wrote an OpEd for the New York Daily News about the susceptibility of bloggers to litigation. The MBA has launched an education, legal and liability program to help bloggers address these issues. Together with NewsU and other partners, they have launched an online course, Online Media Law: The Basics for Bloggers and Other Online Publishers.

Is the lawsuit brought by the Macomb County GOP Chair a legitimate grievance, or is it a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation ("SLAPP"), aimed at creating a chilling effect on bloggers that would report on voting suppression activities? Does the Supreme Court decision, New York Times v. Sullivan. apply? Are you, as a blogger as informed and protected as you should be? Perhaps the MBA’s new program can you determine how well you are staying within the bounds of the law, and how safe you are from litigation.

(Categories: )

Ike

As Hurricane Ike approaches landfall, I’m spending a little time following what people are saying in Twitter. In particular, using Twitter Local I can get all the tweets from people within twenty miles of Houson and withing twenty miles of Galveston. The Galveston tweets are sparse and don’t say much right now, but the Houston tweets have a lot to say.

The Houston Chronicle has a special section on the hurricane, which is sending out updates to their twitter page. ‘Curfew ordered in La Porte’, ‘Humble Emergency Operations Center open and ready’, ‘POWER OUTAGE UPDATE: At least 164,000 without electricity’

Looking more closely, there are interesting comments: “CenterPoint Energy has said that it expects some places to be without power for at least two weeks.“ So, how do you cope with this? There are lots of good suggestions. One that caught my attention was “Cook meat on a gas stove or barbecue grill and start eating it right away. Share with friends and neighbors.”

While the recommendation may have more to do about not wasting leftovers since you can’t refrigerate them without power, there is a more important message underneath that. We are at our best when we all look out for our friends and neighbors. The list goes on to say, “Embrace good old-fashioned entertainment like games, story-telling and conversation.” This too, echoes the importance of being in community, of looking out for one another.

Another note, illustrates what people are in for: “All first responding agencies (fire law enforcement and medical) will cease operation at the onset of 50mph winds. “

Meanwhile, others are finding other ways of dealing with the coming storm. “Getting drunker and drunker as I await Ikey”, “ike-hurricane is giving me a giant headache” “West houston is like a ghost town - looking for the hurricane parties in my hood” “Walking dogs in 40 mph winds - ike is going 2b nasty” “DAMN! The wind is really now blowing hard here in west Houston! Power outage around the corner!” “Done laundry, got food, full gas tank, cash in pocket, generator works, gas stove, time to relax and watch TV till Ike takes the power out!” “things they’re doing at my family's: semi-filling gallons w water 2 freeze, will put ice gallon in fridge when power goes out 2 keep cool”

(Categories: )

Talking About Politics

November 5, 1996. I took my six-year-old daughter, Mairead, up the street to the old firehouse which was our polling location. We talked about the importance of voting and I cast my vote. Sure, it wasn’t particularly close that year, but it has always been important to me to get out and vote no matter how close the elections are.

Mairead was always very bright, and always ready for an argument, and I seem to recall that she felt it was unfair that she didn’t get to vote. After all, she was probably brighter and more informed than many of the adults voting. We probably talked a little bit about how laws were made and how when she was old enough, she could work on lowering the voting age.

Attorney General Blumenthal touched on this at the Obama Rally in Hamden, Connecticut last Saturday when he particularly thanked people that brought their children to the rally. We need to encourage civic involvement starting at an early age.

Twelve long hard years have come and gone. Mairead is off in college and I wanted to make sure she was registered and was going to vote. In response to an email I sent, she wrote, “I want to actually go to a voting place... Remember when you took me to the fire station for the '96 election? I've been waiting ever since.”

I suspect neither of Mairead nor I imagined what those twelve years would be like, or how historic her first vote would be. Yet perhaps that is an important lesson to all of us. Things that we talk about can carry greater significance than we think at the time, even if it takes twelve years to come to fruition.

I suspect the same applies to the comments we leave on blogs. At one blog I visit, a person posted a comment bewailing about the polarization of politics. That same person then went on to compare Obama to Hitler. Excuse me? I don’t think people that compare a U.S. Presidential candidate to Hitler has much ground to complain about other people polarizing politics.

In another discussion, I heard people complaining about how biased the media is and how bad it was that there weren’t going to be more debates. I remember many of the debates during the primaries where the moderator, typically a noted pundit or anchor from one of the major networks spoke more than the candidates. It reminded me of the old joke about a resort up in the Catskills. One person complained, “The food here is horrible” and the other replied, “Yes, and the portions are so small.”

I would love to see good debates that focus on the issues, and don’t resort to candidates and pundits yelling at one another about trivialities. I would love to see people on the web talk about politics without resorting to polarizing rhetoric, and I sure hope that a friend of Mairead will send me a picture this November of her wearing an “I Voted Today” sticker.

So yes, the portions of political dialog are small, the politics are too polarized, but to throw in another great quote, “There is only one thing worse than being talked about, and that’s not being talked about.” So, let’s talk politics. If we can be grown up, the way my daughter was twelve years ago, we can do it without polarizing rhetoric, but even if the best you can do is be divisive, let’s have a discussion.

The Fourth Estate and the Unitary Executive Theory

One of the battlegrounds in our government over the past eight years has been around executive power. It has shown up in skirmishes where people have attempted to obtain information about how Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy policy was crafted. It has shown up in repeated battles over what the congress can compel members of the Bush administration to testify about.

So, it should come as no surprise that the campaign appears to be stretching the Unitary Executive Theory to new limits. Let’s apply them to Republican candidates for Vice President with regards to the media. Yes, the far right are all up in arms that the press wants to know how Sarah Palin is and what she believes. Roger Simon, in his blog post at Politico, Why the media should apologize sums it up nicely:

We have asked questions this week that we should never have asked.

We have asked pathetic questions like: Who is Sarah Palin? What is her record? Where does she stand on the issues? And is she is qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency?

We have asked mean questions like: How well did John McCain know her before he selected her? How well did his campaign vet her? And was she his first choice?

Bad questions. Bad media. Bad.

Needless to say, McCain supporters and staff look at it in a different way. According to a blog post on Think Progress, McCain campaign strategists Rick Davis said on MSNBC’s Morning Joe,

We can afford anything we want to do. … We’re going to do what we think is in our best interest. If that means access to the press, we’ll give it to you

Yes, that is how campaigns are run. They always make their media choices. It is not only what is said on the media, but isn’t said that is important. By not addressing the press, Gov. Palin and the McCain campaign seems to be saying that they want to further the Bush Administration’s stonewalling and refusal to be accountable to the American people. They want to make sure that Cheney’s refusal to reveal how his energy policy was created is carried on for four more years. In essence, they are saying that they do not want to be a government, “Of, by and for the people.”

True, the media isn’t all that it could be, but it is better than nothing. So, yes, the McCain campaign can do whatever they want to do. Voters should do the same, and refuse to vote for a ticket that will not speak about positions, policies, or qualifications with the American media.

Syndicate content