Media
Media
OMMA: The ROI of a Smile
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 09/25/2007 - 12:47In my previous posts about the Online Media, Marketing and Advertising Conference and Expo, I wrote about my perspective as a user generating content that feels someone disconnected with the advertising and marketing folks at OMMA. Here, I explore the ROI discussion a little bit.
First, let me outline the issues as I see them. As these worlds collide, online digital media is having a big impact on the advertising world. Here, I’m less concerned with the movement of content away from radio, local papers, or broadcast television to hyperlocal journalism sites online and to YouTube. Yes, that is manifestation that people are seeing. But ad executives are smart. They can buy advertising in whichever medium is the choice du jour. Instead, there are two important aspects of this change that are much more significant. The first is that advertising needs to become much more of a conversation. I touched on that a little in my previous posts. The second is that in this wonderful new digital age, everything can be measure, or so many people seem to believe, and so, we should be able to come up with much better ROI calculations.
This results in some fairly detrimental black and white thinking. Either the advertisement results in a sale or it doesn’t. As an advertiser, you should only pay when you get a sale, or at least a clickthrough. Yet this ignores how people really act. Instead, people may see multiple ads before they decide to make a purchase. They may develop brand loyalty independent of advertisements and then simply use the advertisements as an easy way to act upon their brand loyalty.
One company that seems to get this, at least somewhat, is eyeblaster. They ran a session entitled Campaign Management: The Holistic Approach to Digital Advertising. I only caught a little bit of their session since it overlapped with some other good sessions. Yet the takeaway I got from them is that if you use eyeblaster, you can track not only who clicked through to buy your product, but also where else they saw your ad, and then you can allocate the revenue across multiple impressions.
There were plenty of other firms touting their ability to track behavior and more carefully target advertisements, but generally I didn’t bother with them. To me, it seems like there is so much more to advertising than the direct sale. Not only are you trying to maximize brand loyalty, but on a greater level, you are focus on increasing corporate goodwill.
Eric Kessler, Co-President of HBO did a great lunchtime presentation about this. He started off his presentation talking about how to build a positive brand image. It was a humorous look at what HBO did with The Sopranos, but the bottom line boiled down to, have a good product. He then spoke in detail about HBO Voyeur. This was not an effort to allocate revenue based on some pay per click basis. This was about communicating the HBO brand.
In essence, the HBO brand is to be innovative, and Kessler did a great job of communicating that. He spoke about creating online campaigns as creative as the shows they were promoting. He talked about creating avatars and streaming part of a Justin Timberlake concert in Second Life.
The HBO Voyeur campaign did this incredibly well. Kessler spoke about how today’s viewers want to be in control and discover things for themselves. Perhaps this gets to the biggest issue. Traditional advertising wants to be in control, and until they relinquish some of that control, they will continue to spiral down to obsolescence. Kessler and HBO seem to get this. Others there get it, but too many don’t. Too many are still trying to calculate the ROI of being in control, instead of the ROI of a smile.
A New York Moment
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 19:11The New York premier of Michael Clayton draws a crowd of photographers and spectators as celebrities pause on the red carpet. Meanwhile, across the street, the attendees of the Online Media, Marketing and Advertising Conference and Expo drink their AOL provided cocktails while the Mission of Iran to the United Nations sits down to dinner in the Mercury Ballroom.
"The Truth Can Be Adjusted", the signs advertise; a message that is perhaps not missed by either the OMMA attendees or members of the Mission of Iran to the United Nations.
It's about the conversation
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 11:56As I sit through the first couple presentations at Online Media, Marketing and Advertising Conference and Expo, I ponder their tag line: "Worlds collide; All Hell Breaks Loose!". How much of a collision will we see here? I look around the room and note that about 5% of the audience have laptops fired up. Perhaps we are still a long way from the collision.
The first couple presentations do not leave time for Q&A. Geoff Ramsey of emarketer.com does a great rapid fire introduction to what is going on in the world of online advertising. Currently, $289 billion is spent on advertising. It is growing at about 3% per year. Of that, $21.7 billion is online advertising and growing much more rapidly. He further breaks it down by email, user generated content (UCG, a phrase that gets repeated a lot), mobile, social networks and video.
He takes the typical swipes at Twitter and Second Life, and I post a quick comment to Twitter about it. I suspect I was the only one using Twitter during his speech. He is followed by Eileen Naughton of Google. There are various comments about Google during the introductions, moderation and Geoff's remarks. Geoff ponders if Google Earth is a precursor to a play in the real estate market by Google. There is a sense of nerveousness about what Google has done, is doing and will continue to do to the advertising market.
Eileen addresses this upfront by talking about convergence istead of conflict. She speaks about how searching is a core consumer behavior. She spends a lot of time talking about YouTube and how the Super Bowl ads played well on YouTube, not only immediately, but continuing afterwards.
What is lacking in both of these presentations is an opportunity for the audience to interact with the speakers, other than laugh at a random funny remark. Perhaps that is what is lacking in so much of the approach to online advertising.
The next speaker is George Kliavkoff, Chief Digital Officer at NBC Universal. He makes a comment about how at the end of the day, they belive professionally produced premium content wins. This sounds a bit like an either or world, either you have professionally produced premium content, or you have amatuer produced crappy material. I don't think it is either/or. In fact, George is so boring that I end up walking out.
I wander down to a session about "making dollars and cents out of social networking". The discussion ends up being mostly about how to target audiences and very little about building community. The exception being a discussion about Flip.com which has a tag line "Make Flipbooks | Make Friends". This panel is different in that there is time for questions and the concerns are with user burnout and the proliferation of social network sites. Will we move to an environment of greater portability between social networks? Perhaps, but people may want to keep their online personae separate. My business persona on LinkedIn or Ryze is different from my social network persona on Facebook or MySpace, and all of that is different from how I appear in political or non-profit spaces.
I think this captures where how we are still a long way from the collision. Online media is increasingly about being connected. SMS messages, Facebook statuses, Twitter messages, being in Second Life. These are about being connected with one another, and not simply sucking the pap broadcast by advertisers creating professionally produced premium content.
This gets amplified for me when kmakice comments about a twitter message saying, "Geoff Ramsey doesn't doesn't get Twitter. It's main value is the sense of connection, not what is typed"
So where is the sense of connection? I'm still looking, and I think that is where the collision really takes place.
OMMA Pregame
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 08:31It is seven in the morning and I'm sitting on the train heading into New York. I woke early this morning with "Where will my feet take me today" echoing in the back chambers of my head. They will take me to OMMA, the Online Media, Marketing and Advertising conference. I've wondered if this is a good use of my time. Last week, I was sick, as was everyone else in the house. I fell behind in my email and in my blogging. On top of that, both my laptop and Kim's laptop crashed, not the simple "time to reboot" crash, the messier, "time to reinstall the operating system" crash. I was up late last night getting my old laptop at least functional, and then I spent a bit more time on the train trying to reconfiguring things.
So, what are my expectations heading into OMMA? I'm not sure. I am wearing the Blogger shirt that Kim embroidered for me. I expect to see a fair amount of suits at the conference. I also wonder how geeky people there will be. I checked, and yes, OMMA is up on Upcoming. However, online one person had signed up. It is up on Confabb, twice, but no one had signed up. As I searched to make sure I had my directions right, the references to OMMA were sparse. One company had sent out a press release that their CEO was speaking. Another had a blog entry about being at the show.
The way I heard about the show is that one site that I use sent out an email to registered users asking that if you are attending the show, please stop by at their booth. As I searched around, I found that there is a Web 2.0 meetup this evening, with many more people signed up. Then, at the end of the week, there is DigitalLife. I wondered about the overlap between DigitalLife, the Web 2.0 Meetup, OMMA and the blogging and social media world I live in. How much overlap will there be?
Today, my feet will take me to OMMA,but I'm still not sure what I'll find there.
“letting the catchy and snarky become the enemy of the good”
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 09/23/2007 - 11:14As I sat napping on my porch overlooking Fountain Street as it pours into New Haven, my wife came by to adjust the blanket over my knees. She stopped to “gently shake my shoulder and wake me up and tell me I was right”.
No, I haven’t written any brilliant article about the prospects of Britney Spears doing an “insightful portrayal of Nora Helmer in Ibsen's "A Doll's House."” If I were writing that line, I might have suggested Britney, Lindsey and Paris in a modern adaptation of Checkov’s “Three Sisters”. But I digress.
What I am referring to this morning is Colin McEnroe’s brilliant column this week in the Hartford Courant, As Free Speech Fades, My Piles Grow.
Colin’s describes the Doninger case as “a douche bag in a coal mine or a canary in a douche bag” and relates it to the Senate passing an amendment to condemn MoveOn for “letting the catchy and snarky become the enemy of the good” in their advertisement illustrating the flaws of Gen. Petreaus.
Kim told me, “Look honey, your not completely off your rocker, even Colin is saying the same sort of things you wrote in your blog.” Here, I’m referring to my blog post, Responses to incivility, where I compared Avery’s case not only to the Senate’s latest amendment, but also to the tasering of the student in Florida.
Feeling fully actualized now that a noted personality has said something similar to what I’ve been blogging, and having been given an opportunity to indulge in a little self aggrandizement, let me MoveOn to the phrase that caught me attention. (I’ve already repeated it twice) “letting the catchy and snarky become the enemy of the good”.
It reflects part of the reason I’m spending more time napping on my porch overlooking Fountain Street and less time engaged in some of the hand-to-hand verbal combat in the political blogs. There are some great masters of catchiness and snarkiness in the political blogosphere. Yet I also worry that many of the let their catchiness and snarkiness get in the way moving their causes forward.
So, I will keep doing things like putting pictures of my ‘Team Avery’ shirt up on Wordless Wednesday to get all the stay at home moms and homeschoolers to stop for a moment and wonder what is going on with our schools. I know the homeschoolers particularly appreciate that.
One online friend has taken this even further. He named Avery Hero for a Day, and then went on to set up Team Avery on CafePress as another part of the fundraising to help cover the cost of the appeal. Please, buy a shirt, donate, and join us at Poets and Writers For Avery in Litchfield on October 14th.
Yes, the whole case is a bit of “a douche bag in a coal mine or a canary in a douche bag”, but to borrow from Pastor Niemoller, “First they came for the gamers, and I did not speak out because I was not a gamer. Then they came for the Bloggers and I did not speak out
because I was not a Blogger…”
I hope I didn’t just let the catchy and snarky become the enemy of the good. I hope you join the good fight to resuscitate the canary in the douche bag.
