Media
We think you’re stupid
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sat, 11/11/2006 - 07:10(Cross posted at Greater Democracy)
Dang! I thought I was cutting edge encouraging people to move beyond blogs to online video. Last week, Zephyr Teachout and Tim Wu had this Op-Ed in the Washington Post: YouTube? It's So Yesterday. It is great food for thought, and I thought I’d share some of my thoughts with you.
Back in October, I wrote about The Political Palimpsest. I had been to the Action Coalition for Media Education Summit in Burlington, VT and had seen the movie The Ad and the Ego. This movie has really influenced my thinking about political messaging and I think applies very nicely to Zephyr and Tim’s Op-Ed.
One point from the movie is that despite claims by many people that they don’t pay attention to advertisements, and that the advertisements don’t affect them, the ads really do have an important effect. That effect is less about the overt message, “Buy this car”, and more about the underlying message, “you aren’t good enough if you don’t consume, if you don’t look like the people in the ads.”
So, what is the underlying message of all the political advertisements that you’ve seen over the past couple weeks? Behind all the negative ads and false information, it seems as if the key message of political ads over this past cycle is “We think you’re stupid”.
Rootscamp in Second Life
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 11/09/2006 - 04:51(Cross posted at Greater Democracy)
For Immediate Release
Contact: Aldon Huffhines, Drew Frobozz, Ruby Glitter
secondlife://Better World/108/95/29
Even before all the votes have been counted from the 2006 midterm elections, progressive political activists gathered at RootsCamp on Better World Island in Second Life to debrief from the midterms and plan innovative strategies to use technology in the 2008 election cycle.
Over the next several days, activists will share ideas and experiences. People interested in actively participating are encouraged to join in. More information is available at http://www.RootsCampSL.org
Emergent thoughts
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 10/24/2006 - 18:07A couple weeks ago, I was a guest at Colin McEnroe’s class about blogging. Yesterday, Jason Scott attended the class, and Colin wrote, “My guess is that Jason, like Aldon, will hang around with us a bit for the rest of the year.”
Well, perhaps Jason and I are two sides of the same bad penny that keeps coming back. Perhaps by looking closely at this penny we can gain some insights into what all this blogging, wiki-ing, IMing, MMORPGing, etc., is all about.
Let me go meta-meta for a moment, in part inspired by a post that Chris wrote about my visit. He suggested that my “mind seemed to work very much like the web.” I wrote a post asking if my mind has been shaped by the web, or if it was my way of thinking that has lead me to the web.
Now I have not read Jason’s writings closely, but it seems as if a key difference is that I am really into emergence, as described by Steven Johnson in his book of the same name. Emergence is messy. It is chaotic. The organization comes from the bottom up, instead of some imposed hierarchical command and control structure. Wikipedia is an emergent structure, and it is the lack of the command and control structure that seems to bother Jason.
This same conflict exists in politics. On the one hand, you have the grassroots populists with their emergent politics. On the other, you have politicians focused on maintaining an existing command and control structure. I suspect this dynamic is playing out in some of the races we are watching.
Now, I don’t want to promote the black and white thinking that is so prevalent in American discourse these days. There isn’t a simple dichotomy of bottom up emergent versus top down command and control. Instead there is a continuum. Joe Trippi understood this continuum and wrote about it in his Perfect Storm blog post.
One of the other reasons I think this has not happened before is that every political campaign I have ever been in is built on a top-down military structure - there is a general at the top of the campaign - and all orders flow down - with almost no interaction. This is a disaster. This kind of structure will suffocate the storm not fuel it. Campaigns abhor chaos - and to most campaigns built on the old top-down model - that is what the net represents - chaos..
So, I will come bank, like a bad penny, and try to get people to think in a more emergent way. Jason might stick around as well and present his views. From the dialog, I hope a clearer understanding of how we organize our thinking will emerge.
Transforming media
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 10/16/2006 - 18:33I’ve been spending a lot of time recently thinking about how the media affects the way we think. I’ve been writing a bit about The Ad and the Ego. It is a great film about how advertising shapes our thinking in terms of telling us who we should be, or at least who the advertisers want us to be.
Yet there is more to it than explicit messages about what we should buy and the implicit messages about how we should view ourselves. The pace of advertisements has changed over the years. Years ago, advertisements were often 60 seconds long, and sometimes longer. They were more ponderous. Now, the ten second spots through the longer thirty second spots throw as much information at us as quickly as possible, before we click our remote to mute the audio or to change channels. Is this rapid-fire information changing the way we think? Is the medium the message?
I’ve thought more about this based on a blog post by Chris, whom I met last week when I visited Colin McEnroe’s Blogging Class. Chris wrote, Aldon's mind seemed to work very much like the web... He seems to have adapted his thinking patterns to the online world in which he is immersed.”
I’ve often wondered how much does the times makes the man and how much does the man makes the times. Perhaps the same applies to the relationship of media to media consumer. Do I hop from hyperlinked thought to hyperlinked thought because of how much time I spend online, or do I spend as much time online, because I’ve always hopped from thought to thought.
I’ve heard people claim that the television viewership by children is increasing cases of ADHD. Yet on the other hand, I’ve often heard it suggested that the increase in ADHD diagnoses is because of increased testing. When I was young, one of my nicknames was ‘fiddle fingers’. I was always fiddling with something. Later on in life, before I started spending a lot of time online, I was well known for tossing out a ‘collection of thoughts’ in any discussion I was part of and I would take notes at meetings, not to remember what was said, but just to keep track of all of the thoughts that would tumble out of my head so that I could get them in when I got a chance to speak. Have I gravitated to hyperlinked organization simply because that is how my mind worked in the first place?
I suspect that there is a little bit of both in there. This isn’t a new question. The events at West Nickel Mines, PA a couple weeks ago have really got me thinking about this. One of these days, I’ll write my great blog entry about this, but for the time being let me toss out a few thoughts. The Amish have always sought to separate themselves from the world around them. I’ve always thought of it in terms of Romans 12:2 “Don't be conformed to this world…” You look at advertising, you look at blogs, and you have to wonder how much our modern media is conforming us to the world.
Yet that is only the first part of the quote. The scripture goes on to say, “…but be transformed by the renewing of your mind”. Blogs, and all of the new media that is growing up around the Internet provides an opportunity to transformation, and that is an important part of why I am online.
So, whether the way we think is molded by the media around us, or we can mold the media around us by our thinking, blogs and other emerging media provides a great opportunity for transformation, and perhaps we all need to think more about our role in such transformations.
The Political Palimpsest
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 10/13/2006 - 11:00(Originally published at Greater Democracy)
The movie, The Ad and the ego has caused me to spend a bit of time thinking about the overall effect of political messages getting etched in our consciousness, only to be scraped away for newer messages to be added, a sort of political palimpsest.
As an aside, I am ever indebted to Judge John M. Woolsey for introducing me to the word "palimpsest" in his decision in the case United States of America v. One Book Called "Ulysses.", which I found in the forward to my copy of the book Ulysses.
Joyce has attempted - it seems to me, with astonishing success - to show how the screen of consciousness with its ever-shifting kaleidoscopic impression carries, as it were on a plastic palimpsest, not only what is in the focus of each man's observation of the actual things about him, but also in a penumbral zone residua of past impressions, some recent and some drawn up by association from the domain of the subconscious.
I started exploring this idea in a post I put up on MyDD entitled, Ad Watch and the Ego Research.
Since I was offline for a few days, I'm digging through all the emails that have piled up in my inbox. There is the standard collection of emails from Howard Dean, John Kerry, Barbara Boxer, and so on, asking me for money, to take time off to get out the vote, to vote in a poll on who my favorite progressive candidate is, etc. I've often wondered if these political request emails have become superfluous. I typically barely glance at them before I move them off to my 'requests' archive, paying them no more attention than I would an advertisement on TV.
That is when it struck me that we need to look at all these requests in a similar light as we look at the advertisements on TV. It isn't about the request or the messaging, it is about residue that gets left on our political palimpsest.
My email box is still overflowing, but I can only take so much at a time, so I took a moment to try and catch up on blogs that I follow through Bloglines, as well as a few others that I go directly too. I scanned a couple hundred posts on official campaign blogs from around the country, again, with about as much attention as I devote to advertisements on TV. This too, then is another part of the political palimpsest.
What then, is the emerging image of our political landscape? I have my own thoughts, which people who read me regularly probably have a sense of, but I wonder what the vista is to you? Perhaps more importantly, are political campaigns thinking about this in their messaging? How could or should they change the whole of their communications to more effectively bring about the change they want?