Archive - 2007

May 28th

Being a crazy uncle on Memorial Day

At Personal Democracy Forum, Matt Stoller presented his 'crazy uncle' theory of internet politics.

He starts off with:

A few years ago, I had what's called a 'crazy uncle' theory of internet politics. I noticed that the figures who did well online all seemed like a crazy uncle saying things that are true but extremely uncomfortable, that power and authority was built on silly illusions.

He ends off with:

The internet is a revolutionary cultural shift, but alone, it was not enough to spark a political movement. What that took was a series of actions by our governing elites that betrayed and threatened millions of liberals…

We are an outgrowth of that culture, a kind of mashup between people who feel betrayed by the right and people who feel comfortable with an open internet platform. We're going to keep getting stronger, because openness is immensely compelling. People have had a taste of power, and it's intoxicating. It's almost as if we're beginning to listen to that crazy uncle who comes over for Thanksgiving and tells you your life is built on comfortable illusions. I mean, he was kind of crazy, but he was also usually right.

Well, I’ve always felt quite a bit of affinity for the crazy uncle myself. I think of the uncles in Chekhov's plays, and I think of Pirsig in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. In Zen, Pirsig writes a bit about systems, both motorcycles, and governments, and observes,

If a revolution destroys a systematic government, but the systematic patterns of thought that produced that government are left intact, then the patterns will repeat themselves in the succeeding government.

I worry that ‘the open left’ may become intoxicated by its power, and that intoxication may bring about a new set of betrayals perhaps no different than the betrayals that Richard Viguerie believes Bush and Other Big Government Republicans foisted upon the conservatives.

But then again, I just might be another crazy old uncle.

(Categories: )

How much is your blog really worth?

As I surf around the blogs, one question that I often stumble across is, how much is your blog really worth. One site looks at the number of incoming links as reported on Technorati and then calculates the value based the value that AOL paid for Weblogs. Based on this, my blog is worth nearly $75,000.


My blog is worth $74,519.28.
How much is your blog worth?

Yet this is a gross over simplification. If all of the links are from my 100 closest friends and all they do is link amongst themselves, that is worth much less than if the links are from the top 100 websites. In theory, this is part of what Google’s PageRank tries to address.

Yet the number of links to a site might not be the best indication of blog value. Another way people think about value of their blog is the number of readers. Yet this number might be misleading as well. Looking at my raw logs, I get around 4000 hits a day on my site, from around 1200 different IP addresses. Over the past 4 months, I’ve had around 400,000 visits from over 60,000 unique sites. However, this includes webcrawlers, spambots, and who knows what else. Filtering out this, the traffic, a more realistic number is probably around 1400 real hits a day. On the other hand, that doesn’t include people who read the site from my RSS feed.

Of course, if you are looking at pay per view advertising, no one wants to use your internal numbers, everyone wants to count by themselves, and these counters can be all over the place. Counters use small images which might not get displayed, javascript that might not get executed, and so on. I’ve tried various sitecounters and usually turn them off when I find that there is no correlation between internal logs, and different external sitecounters. In addition, I’ve found that the sitecounters often slow down my site.

The latest sitecounter that I’ve started playing with is Quantcast. It looks like they may provide some interest data, for sites with enough traffic.

Yet even traffic count may not be the best way to judge a website’s traffic. What is more interesting is the amount of influence a site has. If Keith Olberman or Anderson Cooper talks about your website on the air, even if no one comes to visit the site as a result of the mention, the site is probably more influential than if the only person talking about the website is your mother and a couple siblings. However, most of us don’t get our site mentioned by celebrities, so this is not an easy metric to analyze.

That said, the other day, I got an email from a PR flack trying to get me to write about his client. I asked why anyone reading my blog would be interested in hearing about the flack’s client, and the only response was that the client as ‘entertaining’. While I know that a lot people are interested entertainment in blogs, it isn’t particularly my style. Yet it did indicate that at least one PR flack out there seems to think my blog is influential.

Even more important might be the impact that a blog has. Blog Catalog is asking bloggers to use their blogs to bring attention to Donors Choose, a nonprofit raising money for public school classrooms around the country. Here is the BlogCatalog Challenge Link.

Closer to home, I receive an email from my friend Lynne. She is participating “Bennett Cancer Center Hope In Motion annual Walk, Run and Ride event on June 3rd” and has an online fundraising page up here. Please, stop by and add your contribution.

Beyond that, the other day, I wrote about links from people I ran into at Personal Democracy Forum. These included Change.org and PledgeBank. After I wrote that, I received an email from Robert Tolmach about ChangingThePresent.org. All of these sites are similar to OurVoicesTogether, which Kim used to find my Christmas Present last year.

So, let us take a few moments, and think not about how many links, or readers, or influential readers or whatever we have as a means of finding value for our blogs, and instead do what we can to help people around us.

(Categories: )

May 27th

The impossible heap

In Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert Pirsig differentiates between what he calls ‘Classical understanding’ and ‘Romantic understanding’, in part, by using the illustration of a handful of sand.

Classical understanding is concerned with the piles and the basis for sorting and interrelating them. Romantic understanding is directed toward the handful of sand before the sorting begins. Both are valid ways of looking at the world although irreconcilable with each other.

What has become an urgent necessity is a way of looking at the world that does violence to neither of these two kinds of understanding and unites them into one.

I don’t know if Pirsig had the tradition of making mandala’s out of sand in mind when he wrote these words, since it seems as if such monks have united these understandings.

These mandala’s made the news this week when a young boy danced in such a mandala at Union Station in Kansas City, MO. (See Boy Destroys Monks' Sand Art At Union Station, for more details.)

It reminded me of a skit I saw back in college. The announcer said ‘REALISM’, and a man came out a mimed unsuccessfully trying to pick up some weights. The announcer then said ‘IDEALISM’, and the man mimed picking up the weights with ease. The two were repeated a couple times, and then the announcer said ‘EXISTENTIALISM’. The man mimed carrying the barbells over his shoulder, turning around and knocking over ‘REALISM’, hearing the noise, turning the other direction to see what had happened and knocking over ‘IDEALISM’.

Was this what happened with the young boys dance? No, part of the tradition of the sand mandala’s is to sweep up the sand, and put it in a nearby river. It is a reminder that nothing lasts forever. The boy was bringing that reminder a little bit ahead of schedule.

It makes me think of the great poem by W.H. Auden, Musee des Beaux Arts,

How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:

Is there something we can learn about our best-laid plans, about how nothing lasts forever, or about suffering? I find the comments to the article about this on Anderson Cooper’s blog

On parenting:

“His mom should have had more of an eye on him and more control over him! Some people just let their kids run wild and don't pay enough attention to them!!”

“That little boy spent some minutes away from his Mother, and I bet she'd be the first one to b*tch and moan if he was snatched by someone looking to hurt a little kid. Both should be punished.”

“Good parenting there, mom. Nice way to teach accountability by picking up the kid and skedaddling.”

On the media:

“I mean really, do you feel these topics are worthy the attention of the populance?

It seems to me there are many more worthy topics in the news at present. Like for instance, the passing of the War Funding Bill, Senator Clinton's No Vote on the contentious Iraq supplemental bill, the upcoming meeting with Iran and World Diplomats, US Aid Arrives in Lebanon, North Korea test missiles, et al.”

To a person that seems to get some of the message of the art and the incident:

When someone hurts us we should write it in sand so the winds of forgiveness can erase it away but, when someone does something good for us we should write it in stone where no wind can ever erase it.

One final quote to pull it all together:

The Moon Cannot be Stolen

Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing to steal.
Kyokan returned and caught him. "You may have come a long way to visit me, " he told the prowler, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please take my clothes as a gift."
The thief was bewildered. He tool the clothes and slunk away.
Ryokan sat naked, watching the moon. "Poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could give him this beautiful moon."

(Categories: )

Communion

Sunday morning, very bright, I read Your book by colored light
That came in through the pretty window picture.

One of the most important rules about having a successful blog, all the experts say, is to have a clear niche. Write about one thing, stay on message and keep your focus. If you’re going to write about technology, stay with technology. If you’re going to write about progressive politics, stay with that. The same goes for religion, personal blogging, etc. The rationale for this seems to be the fear that strikes many media educators about what is happening to the way people consume media.

More and more, people are searching the web for viewpoints that match their own. As a progressive, I can go out and find other people writing from a progressive viewpoint. As a Christian, I can find people writing from a Christian viewpoint. The more different viewpoints a write brings to their blog, the more they will narrow the audience, the theory goes.

Yet the increasing Balkanization of our media consumption is something the media educators fear. Take a look at EPIC. How do we deal with the dangers of an increasingly Balkanized society of media consumers?

For me, the first line of defense is rejecting the adage to keep my blog confined to a narrow niche. Instead, I will write about politics, about being a husband, a father, a brother and a son. I will write about media and technology and even religion.

I started blogging several years ago as many of my friends from a different online community moved from a synchronous text based programmable game-oriented chat room to blogging. I spent a lot of time at a place called LambdaMOO. The space was created around the space of the originators house. I think a house is a great metaphor for that sort of space, as well as for the space that a blog creates, and I named the Orient Lodge Blog after the house I was living in when I started the blog.

In the dining room, there is a picture of Gov. Dean holding my daughter at one rally or another. It sits next to a crucifix and some crafts that my wife made to liven up and add a touch of hominess to the dining room.

At our table, we have had a wide variety of guests, political, religious, business leaders, and technologists. There has been great food and great laughter. There has been communion. I seek to share this communion online, knowing that if the experts are right, I will drive away everyone who doesn’t match my unique and eclectic views, yet believing that we are better than that. That we can sit down with people

So the Christians and the Pagans sat together at the table,
Finding faith and common ground the best that they were able,
And where does magic come from? I think magic's in the learning,

So, I hope that my gifted pagan anime-loving lesbian readers, by Buddhist technology activist readers, my atheist progressive political readers, my cancer surviving southern Christian mommy readers, my retired conservative economic professor readers, and a wide range of other readers can all sit at the table and share ideas.

(Note: Lyrics are Hymn by Peter, Paul and Mary, and The Christians and the Pagans, by Dar Williams. It is my belief that both are protected by copyrights and the use falls within the best practices in fair use, specifically, “quoting copyrighted works of popular culture to illustrate an argument or point.” For more information on Fair use, please check out The Center for Social Media’s webpage, Copyright and Fair Use.)

(Categories: )

May 25th

Interconnectivity

In the early days of computer networking, email systems weren’t interconnected very well. You might be on Prodigy, Sprintnet, Compuserve, attmail, BITNET, DECnet, uucp, X.400 or SMTP or some other email system. If you learned the magical incantations, you could manage to get a message from one network to another, sometimes traversing intermediary networks.

If you weren’t connected directly to the internet, you could send an email to an FTP email gateway to get files send to your email. More recently, people have talked about how to interconnect IM systems. They’ve looked at adding in chat rooms and even SIP based phones.

At Personal Democracy Forum, a new type of interconnectivity came up. How do we interconnect our online social networks? What might this interconnection do for us?

One early effort was FOAF, or the The Friend of a Friend project. Various people tried various things with FOAF. Tribe.net supports FOAF. Some of the early software in the Dean campaign supported FOAF. There were a few FOAF crawlers around, but none of this really got off the ground. It hasn’t proven useful for adding remote friends.

At PDF, Chris Messina brought up XFN, the Xhtml Friends Network. I’ve made changes to my support XFN. I’ve tagged my links accordingly and submitted my site to Rubhub, which is one of the few XFN tools out there that I can find. Unfortunately, Rubhub isn’t listing my site yet. So, I haven’t found anything useful from XFN yet. However it does have potential.

I went through about 25 of the social networks I’m part of and added up the links I have in all of them. The total number of links was nearly 1200. A few networks dominated my list with Facebook, LinkedIn, LiveJournal, Twitter and PartyBuilder accounting for over half the links. Change.org is the one that is climbing rapidly right now, after just coming out of Beta.

Now it is worth noting that there is probably a lot of overlap in these 1200 links. It would be really interesting to see what that overlap is. Perhaps more interesting is to find where I have friends on multiple networks, but don’t know where they are on other networks. Beyond that, it would be interesting to have an amalgamated friends list, showing all my friends, which networks they are on, and a summary of all that is going on in my networks.

Can we use XFN, FOAF or other tools to better connect our social networks? What changes can we bring about by making better connections? It will be an interesting thing to explore. Until then, if you are friends of mine on one of the networks listed on the right, and on any of the other networks, but not my friend there, please give me an add. Likewise, if your not on some of these networks, and want to get started, please join up and let me know.