Archive - Oct 2008

October 25th

Hard Cider - Batch 1, Day 1



Fiona with the Cider, originally uploaded by Aldon.

Today, we started on an adventure to make our first batch of hard cider. Essentially, we are looking for a way to let the cider ferment into an alcoholic beverage, like various hard ciders we’ve had in the past.

My wife’s ex-husband had been an home beer brewer, so we borrowed a couple ‘carboys’ from him and a fermentation lock. A carboy is a large jug, in our case, it can probably hold about six and a half gallons. So, we bought five gallons of fresh untreated cider from a local cider mill, poured them into the carboy, added some yeast, put the fermentation lock on top and are letting nature take its course.

We are fortunate. The cider mill near where we live uses a cold method of pasteurizing their cider, running it under ultra violet lights. Sites have suggested that if you are going to use pasteurized cider this is the best type to go with. However, our cider mill does one step better. They will sell untreated cider to people who specifically ask for it.

We asked for five gallons of untreated cider, and an older man at the mill asked if we were making hard cider. We told him of the carboy we had borrowed and the yeast we had gotten. He said that next time we should just bring the carboy and they would fill it up directly. It is nice to know that they do that and if things go okay and we decide to make a second batch, that is how we’ll approach it.

At home, being the geek that I am, I thought I’d go out and read various sites for their comments about how to make hard cider, and we found a lot of different options. After talking about these options, we’ve decided on what our course will be for this first glass.

A serious brewer would probably measure the specific gravity of the sweet cider and do all kinds of calculations as to whether or not to add some sort of sugar, depending on how sweet and how strong they wanted the cider to be.

One site suggested adding two pounds of sugar per gallon. My guess is that this would make a very strong hard cider which could be 12-14% alcohol. This would make it similar to table wine, or perhaps a little stronger. Adding no sugar would make a hard cider which would be something like 4.5 – 5.0 % alcohol, or something a little weaker than a typical beer. We’ve decided that for this batch, we will not add any sugar, at least at this stage.

The yeasts in the cider turn the sugar in to alcohol. Here is the next decision. A purist might use just the yeast that came off the apples and let the fermentation begin. A different type of purist might add Campden’s tablets. These are sulfur-based tablets used to kill off any bacteria as well as any natural yeast. Other purists of this ilk, prefer to warm the cider up to 140 degrees for twenty minutes to kill off bacteria.

We chose a third approach. We decided to leave the natural yeasts, and any natural bacteria that there might be, but to give the yeast a little help by adding some additional yeast. There are many different types of yeasts that you can add. Some people like to add a champagne yeast. Champagne yeasts can withstand a much higher alcohol content and are a good idea if you are making a really strong hard cider. There are also special yeasts for making hard cider, and we went with one of these for our first batch. Others like to use a yeast made for making ale, or just a regular wine yeast.

Kim talked about Weissen yeast or Lambic yeast. These sound like interesting ideas that we might try for a subsequent batch.

The yeast turns the sugars to alcohol and to carbon dioxide. The fermentation lock allows the excess carbon dioxide to escape without allowing bacteria or oxygen in. Many people worry about any new bacteria destroying the taste of the hard cider, however the bigger concern is excess oxygen allowing the alcohol to oxidize and become vinegar.

Depending on how warm the house stays and how much sugar we put in, the cider should complete its first fermentation between two weeks and three months. Since we’ve added no additional sugar, it will probably be closer to two weeks, however it could stretch out a little because we keep our house colder than most people do. The three month fermentation came from the site that suggested adding two pounds of sugar per gallon of cider.

During dinner, we heard an occasional burping sound. The fermentation has gotten off to a good start. It is still several minutes between these burps. When things get going, I’m told we can see at least a bubble a minute. When it drops off from that level, it will be time for the next step.

Here, we will be faced with our next choice. The first is to call the whole thing done. This will result in a thicker, yeastier cider. Or, we can draw off the cider into a second carboy for a second fermentation. This fermentation will help clarify the cider as the last of the yeast settles out. From what I’m reading, this should take two to four additional weeks. Right now, we are planning to do a second fermentation. However, we might take a little bit of the cider at this point, just to see how it is, and perhaps bottle a little to see how this ages.

At this point, it will be time to bottle the cider. If we want the cider to be ‘still’, that is, not have any bubbles, we can bottle it as is. However, if we want it bubbly, we will need to add a little additional sugar. One site suggests three-fourths of a cup of honey or sugar equally added to the five gallons. Right now, we are thinking we will split this and bottle some with sugar and some with out.

Have any you made hard cider before? What methods did you use? How did it turn out? I’ll let you know how ours does as things develop.

Update, a year later: In September 2009, I've started getting a bit of traffic on this blog post. Since I first wrote this post, I've made more batches and written more about my cider making experiments. I would encourage any new visitors to check out the whole Hard Cider section of my blog.

Something very scary at Halloween Hoot

A mom dressed as Sarah Palin

(Categories: )

October 24th

Making Better Use of Twitter

More and more of my friends are using Twitter, and now Media Shift on PBS has an article on How 'Follower Spam' Infiltrated Twitter -- and How to Stop It. So, I thought I’d share a few of my tips for making better use of Twitter.

Adding material to Twitter

There are plenty of tools for accessing and adding content directly to Twitter. I have a Twitter Gadget for Windows Vista on one of my machines. I run Twirl. I run TwitterBox in Second Life all in addition to simply sending material directly from the Twitter Web page or to Twitter as an SMS message from my cellphone.

However, there are some other tools that I like to use as well. One is Twitterfeed. Twitterfeed will subscribe to the RSS feed of your blog, or other sites, such as BlogTalkRadio feeds, and submit them to Twitter under your username. I use this to send messages to Twitter when I add a blog post to Orient Lodge.

BrightKite works essentially the same as Twitter, but is focused on your location. It can feed Twitter. I use BrightKite sparingly. If I’m going to meetings or a conference in New York, I’ll use it, but I don’t use it for more mundane activities, like stopping at the gas station. Other sites also feed Twitter. I like to use Utterli.com to send audio messages from my cellphone. Unfortunately, Utterli sends indecipherable messages to Twitter and I think it has driven away a follower or two.

If I want to leave a voice message that people are more likely to receive, I like to use TwitterFone. TwitterFone uses voice recognition to take an audio message and leave it as a text message on Twitter. The voice recognition can be hit or miss, but then again, my typing on my cellphone is also often hit or miss.

Two other tools that I like are ping.fm and hellotxt. Both of these sites, as well as some others allow you to send one message that then gets sent to many of your microblogging at status update sites.

Reading and sharing information on Twitter

At the other end of the spectrum is FriendFeed. Friendfeed pulls together all of the material you publish online. If you are using both ping.fm and FriendFeed, your FriendFeed can get overloaded with duplicates, so be careful about how you arrange things.

One thing that I really like about FriendFeed is the rooms. You can set up a room to show all the activity of a group of people. Currently, I’m following 835 people on Twitter and it can be hard to keep track of all the different discussions. So, I group people into rooms. I’m in a couple rooms for that contain my political friends on Twitter. Other rooms are dedicated specific online communities, like the EntreCard Room.

Another tool that I use a lot, for various reasons, is TwitterLocal. It allows you to find recent Tweets from people around a specific zipcode.

Sometimes, I like to look at Tweet 2 Tweet. I stumbled across them quite accidentally one day. What they do is allow you to put two Twitter names in and see any discussion back and forth between these users.

On last organizing tool that I recently heard about is My Social Chatter. It displays Twitter on one side and FriendFeed on the other side and updates every two minutes.

Dealing with Followers

Currently, I’m following 839 people on Twitter and have 1,408 followers. Obviously, I’m not following everyone that follows me. I do get emails when people start following me, but when my email box gets really full, I don’t always see or follow up on those emails. With LessFriends, you can go out and see who is following you, whom you are following, and when you and someone else are mutually following each other. They do note that it can take a long time, especially if you have lots of followers or are following a lot of people.

I grabbed the report and threw it into Excel and it seemed to miss a lot of people. It only returned 859 different people, and I have more followers than that. However, I was surprised at the number of people that I’m following that are not following me back. Some are national organizations which I can understand that they don’t follow me back. Others are friends that use Twitter only to highlight their blog entries. Some, on the other hand, are friends that I would have thought would follow me. Perhaps they aren’t following me for the same reason I’m not following others, simply because we didn’t get the email, or the email got buried.

When I started checking people that are listed as following me that I am not following, I’m finding that it is inaccurate, and I’m actually following them.

When I discovered this, I decided not to take the report all that seriously, and, for example, unfollow people that it lists as me following, but not following me.

It does seem, however, that other people are using this strategy. Recently, I found another interesting site, Qwitter. If you sign up, it will send you a message whenever it finds someone that has stopped following you on Twitter. Each morning when I sit down to my email, I find many new people following me and many old people qwitting following me. In many cases these are sites about making quick money online, and I don’t follow them when they follow me, and I don’t mind when they stop following me. However, at times, I find people that I care about stopping following me. It makes me sad, but so far, I haven’t contacted people to ask why.

There is a lot you can do with Twitter and related sites. You can simply keep friends informed about the moment to moment events in your life. You can publicize your other content, and you can join in fascinating discussions. To do this, there are a lot of sites worth investigating. If you know of some other good sites, please tell me.

Recent ma.noglia bookmarks

(Categories: )

October 23rd

Learning about Online Media Law

As part of renewing my membership with the Media bloggers Association (MBA) I needed to take a fascinating News University course, Online Media Law: The Basics for Bloggers and Other Online Publishers. I’ve paid a lot of attention to online media law over the last year or two, and friends said I should be able to zip right through the course. I probably could have, but I decided to take my time and pay extra close attention.

The course was developed as a joint project by the Media Bloggers Association, the Citizen Media Law Project, the Center for Citizen Media, City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism, Baruch College, and Media/Professional Insurance. It focuses on three key areas that anyone posting material online should be aware of, defamation, privacy and copyright.

Not only is the course useful in helping people who post material online determine what they should and shouldn’t post, it is also helpful in understanding what other publishers, whether they be major blogs, newspapers, or whatever should be thinking about. It would be great to have a nice summary of the key points of the class. Such a summary would fit very nicely along side the Society of Professional Journalism’s Code of Ethics. If everyone publishing online kept the online media law course notes and the code of ethics in mind, we would see a vast improvement in what is written online.

The course started off talking about defamation; libel and slander. It talked about the differences between public figures and officials, people who are public figures in a limited capacity, such as being an expert in a specific field, and private individuals. It talked about what is required to prove defamation, including when ‘actual malice’ needs to be shown, and the fact that corporations as well as individuals can be defamed and claim damages.

It went on to talk about privacy issues and what sort of material may raise issues, and ended off with a good discussion of copyright, as well as fair use issues. All in all, I probably spent two hours going through the course, and I’m likely to go through it often just to review and brush up on the issues.

There were exercises, including the opportunity to look at actual cases and make your own determination as to whether you thought defamation, invasion of privacy or copyright infringement was taking place. This gets to one of my gripes about the course. If your opinion on the merits of a particular case different from the opinion rendered by a judge hearing that case, they would say that you are incorrect. In some examples, this was even the situation with cases that had been ruled one way but were currently under appeal. The problem is that laws are not black and white and one judge’s opinion is not necessarily the ‘correct’ opinion. Instead of saying correct or incorrect, it would be better to note that you agreed with or disagreed with the judge on the case. What I would love to see is a place where people could discuss the merits of different cases and learn from one another.

With all of this in mind, I received an email from an organization I’ve been following. With permission of the person sending the email, I’m printing excerpts from a public statement. An article, critical of the organization had recently been published. The organization claimed the article was “inaccurate and misleading in the extreme.”

The organization had retained outside counsel to “to conduct a full review of governance, [and] corporate structure” of the organization. A newspaper obtained a copy of that review and presented it in a very different manner.

The counsel for the organization wrote that the article

misrepresents the purpose and context of my June memo as well as my conclusions and recommendations. I was providing confidential advice to a group of organizations that I knew would come under just the sort of politically motivated attacks we have seen this fall. My advice was offered for the organizations to be prepared to defend themselves against any imaginable allegation that might be brought. Accordingly, I flagged areas where I had concerns about their ability to affirmatively and formally prove the absence of legal violations. This is a far cry from stating that any actual violation had occurred or even that it may have.

As I read this, my mind went over aspects of the Online Media Law class. Was there actual malice by the reporter? I hesitate to claim actual malice in most cases, and I’m not sure if there was actual malice in this case. I just don’t have enough information. Was there publication of private facts? Clearly, the legal advice provided by counsel was intended to be confidential. Yet for a case about publication of private facts to be actionable, according to the class, it must be highly offensive to a reasonable person and not of legitimate concern to the public. In this case, I’m not sure either of those criteria were met. It seems as if ‘False Light’ fits even more closely, because it sure sounds like the article placed the organization and perhaps the lawyer in a false light. Is any of this actionable? I’m not a lawyer, and I’m not representing the organization in question or the newspaper, so I’ll reserve judgment.

A little later, I stumbled across Howie Klein’s blog post Gee, I Hope John Shadegg Isn't Planning On Suing Me After He Loses His Congressional Seat In 2 Weeks!. Klein talks about a blog post he had up referring to a book which alleged sexual misconduct by a member of Congress. Like with the example above, people could argue all kinds of different aspects of the case and it would be fascinating to watch an informed discussion of the issues. As I thought about it, many different considerations from the class came to mind.

Anyway you cut it, there is a lot to Online Media Law and I strongly encourage people to take the course. If you’re publishing material online, it is very important. If you’re simply trying to make more sense of what goes on in the media, it is a fascinating and enjoyable course.

(Categories: )