Archive - Apr 2008

April 12th

Understanding Tori, from the playgrounds to the killing fields

What is up with those girls from Florida? It seems like a question a lot of people are asking, at least rhetorically. I put a blog post up about Victoria ‘Tori’ Lindsey yesterday, and it’s already been viewed at least 500 times. Now for a megablog, that isn’t a big thing. They get 500 views in the blink of an eye. But, on my humble little blog, that’s a lot. So, what is the story of Tori and the other girls? It seems like there must be more to the story.

I wrote something similar as I tried to understand Erin Markes, the 19 year old mother from Florida who has been accused of neglecting her 4 year old son. As with that case, I don’t have any more details than anyone else searching the Internet could come up with, but I do have one thing different, a desire to try and understand what is going on in other people’s minds, a desire to get a broader perspective.

Is that what people who came to my previous post about Tori are looking for? Is that what people who are reading this post are looking for? How do we understand this in our own contexts?

So, I’ve spent a bit of time surfing around. I’m not sure I have any great insights into what went on, what is going on with our country, or what people are looking for online, but let me take a shot at some of this.

Mostly, what I am reading is horror and disgust. I read about the parents of the attackers receiving death threats, and I find phone numbers and addresses of the girls. I kicked around calling people to see if anyone would comment. But the parents, I am sure, have been harassed enough, and the girls are under a gag order.

One headline I saw asked, ‘Could your teen be next?’ Yeah. That is a fear that I suspect every parent has. You hear about a beating like that, you hear about a gunman shooting up a school, and you worry about if your teen could be next. Typically, the worry is about one’s kid being a victim. Yet another worry, that I wish more parents would worry about, is if their kid could be an attacker.

I don’t know what the situation was with Tori and her parents, or any of the other girls and their parents, but a recurring theme is, “What was wrong with those parents?” “Why didn’t those parents teach their kids right from wrong?”

I hope and believe none of my daughters would ever be caught in either side of a situation like Tori’s. I hope and believe they know that I love them, and will do whatever I can to help them through difficult times, but also that there are behaviors that are simply not tolerated. I wish more parents had these kinds of hopes and beliefs. I do know how hard it can be to raise teenage girls. I have two of them which present special challenges to me.

I read other comments. A law enforcement officials’ blog, where they compare notes of teens they’ve had to deal with and share their thoughts about the case.

I read news reports with the standard lines where the parents and friends of the attackers talk about how they were good kids and they just didn’t understand how this could have happened. I remember hearing one journalism professor talking about how this has become a cliché and it reflects sloppy journalism.

As I read comments like this, Tom Petty’s Free Fallin comes to mind

She's a good girl, loves her mama
Loves Jesus, and America too
She's a good girl, crazy 'bout Elvis
Loves horses, and her boyfriend too

It goes on to talk about “And the good girls are home with broken hearts”. Was this part of it? Some reports I’ve read indicate that it started over stuff being said on a MySpace page about a boy, and suggested that there was some sort of love triangle going on.

I don’t know if its true, but it sure fits a familiar narrative. Perhaps there is even a little bit about conflict between cliques, you know, a little Montague and Capulet action going on. “There’s a place for us…” People forget that Romeo and Juliet are cast at around that age, and the great remake, West Side Story is all about high school.

It is a trying time, love, emotions that seem overwhelming and out of control. The group of close friends, BFF. And then, the imagined invulnerability. Sure, you can put a video on the Internet of you severely beating up another person and not land in jail, just like you drink until you can’t stand, and still be able to drive home safely.

So, the newspaper articles talk about the defendants. Some hid behind their long hair. Some started to tear up. Others looked angrily at photographers. Still others smiled or even laughed.

As I read the comments, people are looking for a teachable moment. They want these kids thrown behind bars and the keys thrown away. They want the harshest possible punishment, to let other kids know that this isn’t acceptable behavior. If I thought that would prevent something like this from happening again, I might agree. But I just don’t think it would be an effective deterrent.

Instead, I hope that these kids have the best lawyers possible. I’m not talking about lawyers that can help the kids avoid responsibility for what they have done. No, I hope that they have lawyers that say something like,

“I don’t know if you really understand how serious this is. You could go to jail for life, and you would not be very safe there.” I hope that the lawyers would continue on with something like, “Showing remorse is not going to be good enough. There are people that want to give you a beating a hundred times worse than you gave Tori.” Then, the discussion would move to how to make real reparations.

These reparations would probably start off with some serious psychotherapy, getting the kids to understand what they did, why they did it and why some many people want the harshest possible retribution. Beyond that, how do you make real reparations?

Perhaps, a good starting point would be for them to learn about their actions taken to the extreme, when one group of people attempts to deliberately and systematically destroy another group of people; genocide. The slaughter of Armenians during World War I, the Assyrians massacred in Iraq in 1933, the holocaust, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Darfur.

Perhaps, if one of these kids could become a leading spokesperson against all kinds of bullying, from the scuffle in the schoolyard playground to the genocidal killing fields around the world, then, perhaps, just perhaps, there can be real reparations, and meaning can be salvaged from a horrid meaningless crime.

No, I don’t understand Tori, what was going on with her parents, her friends, any sort of romantic interests or even with herself. Nor do I understand what was going on with the kids that participated in the beating. Likewise, I do not understand how genocide can happen, and how countries can stand idly by, sponsoring athletic games, while at the same time sponsoring companies in countries that practice genocide.

There is a lot I don’t understand, but maybe that is the problem for all of us. Maybe none of us really understand the people around us as well as we should. Maybe we take the easy way out, by reading the stories and expressing our frustration, and not trying to understand.

If you’ve made it this far, thank you. Perhaps we can all work together to seek greater understanding.

(Categories: )

April 11th

Victoria Lindsey, Erin Markes and Avery Doninger

Three teenage women provide very different insights into the use of the Internet by today’s youth.

Yesterday, Erin Markes, 19, appeared in court in a child dependency hearing to find out if she would get her four year old son, who suffers from lissencephaly back from the state. She entered a formal denial of her child neglect charges at the hearing and another hearing is scheduled for May 5. Ms. Markes is also scheduled to be arraigned on charges of child neglect on April 16th. Led by members of the Lissencephaly Network, there is a petition to Exonerate Erin and Give her child back.

While others have been using the Internet to plead Erin’s case, Dianne Fitzgerald, president of the Lissencephaly Network, and the person who started the petition reported that Erin had made use of the networks online forum to seek help in how to care for her child.

The second young woman I would like to highlight is Avery Doninger. I’ve written a lot about her case. She is the student that referred to ‘the douchebags at the central office’, was banned from the ballot on a school election and now is awaiting a ruling by the Second Circuit on her case. While the word ‘douchebag’ may not have been the best word to use in the blog post, it was part of an effort, including a mass emailing, to get people more involved in the school district. The response by the administration seems to be more about trying to discourage student involvement that it is about choice of words.

This leads us to the third young woman online. Victoria Lindsey, according to some other girls was ‘talking trash’ online. She was severely beaten, with the beating being video taped and placed online. The girls doing the beating are now facing twenty years to life in prison. For details, see the blog post on ProgressiveU: Victoria Lindsey Beating and the commentary by Shelly Palmer on Jack Meyer’s site, What We Can Learn From Eight Florida Teens.

Each of these stories tells us a little bit about how the Internet can be used for good or ill and how people may respond appropriately or inappropriately to content online.

So, my thoughts go out to Erin, Avery and Tori as they all deal with their moments of fame, amplified by the Internet.

April 10th

The Daily Show Takes a Serious Look at Second Life

(Originally posted at SLNN.COM)

Following the Congressional hearings about Second Life, Jon Stewart delved into the underlying issues as part of his news broadcast, The Daily Show.

(Categories: )

Updates

For a brief moment, earlier today, it felt like I was catching up. Sure there were over 1,000 unread emails in my inbox, but I had gotten done the tasks that needed to get done and I could sit down and start looking through the pile of emails that have piled up and select the next tasks to tackle.

One of those emails, however, was from the lawyer for the foreclosure, so I felt I needed to write a little bit about that. Then, I got an IM in Second Life about the film shoot folks from TechSoup were doing in response to the Daily Show episode, Avatar Heroes. I’ve already written up my article about Avatar Heroes for SLNN.COM. I figured I should go and join the TechSoup folks. I participated in a dolphin avatar shape, and it strikes me that I need to form an organization, Dolphin Shaped Reporters of Second Life. Right now, I think it is just me and Rob Riggle. If there are any other Dolphin Shaped Reporters in Second Life, please let me know.

(You can see a few pictures I took at Avatar Heroes on Flickr.)

In other things, I’ve spent a bit of time working on a Drupal 6 installation. It has been fun mixing together pieces of the VotingAPI and Fivestar module, with the profile module and attempting to add Views into the mix. Unfortunately, Views doesn’t work well with VotingAPI in Drupal 6, so I had to roll a couple blocks of my own.

Soon, I will ran off to pick up our Community Supported Agriculture box and then take Fiona to her swimming lesson. When I get back, I need to do an interview or two in Second Life, so I guess the queue of unread emails will just have to grow a little more before I can dig into it.

Foreclosure Redux

Several months ago, I spoke informally with a friend of mine that is a lawyer about our financial situation. At this point, we had already moved out of the house being sold in foreclosure and had started putting our lives together for whatever the next phase would be.

The information she provided was extremely valuable, particularly as it applied to the legal aspects. However, she also spoke about the emotional aspects. Seeing a house you have lived in for years, that you’ve raised your family in, sold on the auction block can be emotionally draining. She warned about it being an emotional roller coaster. Unexpected turns will leave you reeling. Today, I received an email that is the latest of the unexpected turns.

I have three competing interests in the foreclosure drama. I want to see the house bought by someone that will love the house as much as I did, and that will be able to do restorations which I could never afford. I would love to see the sale address as much of the financial debt that I have as possible. Finally, I would like to see this brought to an end, so I can get on with the rest of my life.

As things stand right now, as I understand things, I remain the owner of the house until such as point when the court approves the Motion for Approval of Committee Sale and then the bank closes on the sale. Until that point, I could delay the process by filing bankruptcy, by raising objections to how the foreclosure has proceeded, or perhaps on other procedural grounds. Until that point, if I can work out a deal that will meet my desires as well as the desires of the lien holders on the property, I can proceed with such a deal. After that, it goes to the bank to handle the marketing and subsequent sale of the property.

Today, one of the registered bidders contacted the lawyer for the committee to sell 247 Old Long Ridge Road suggesting that the information distributed by members of the historical commission may not have been accurate, may have dissuaded potential bidders from bidding, and might be grounds to conduct a new auction.

My understanding is that the information presented by the historical society was correct and that the reason people did not bid had nothing to do with that information. Instead, the primary concern seemed to be about the ability to meet the requirement of finding funding within thirty days. Given the current credit crunch such funding would be extremely difficult and would constitute a significant risk to any bidder.

That said, numerous people have expressed an interest in bidding, if a new auction were arranged. So, while I’m seeking closure and moving on, if you have thoughts or ideas about trying to arrange a second auction, let me know.

(Categories: )