Archive - Apr 2008
April 10th
The Best of Virtual Worlds 2008
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 04/10/2008 - 10:57(Originally published at SLNN.COM)
There were many high points to Virtual Worlds 2008; new ideas, new worlds, and new tools.
April 9th
Bong Hits 4 the Dalai Lama
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 16:42The social media coverage of the torching of San Francisco cannot pass without comment; there is so much to talk about. Over on Twitter, Ruby tweeted, “Social media tipping point: there is so much micro-coverage of the SF protests that the media will have less leeway to get it wrong.”
This gets to a common talking point about social media. As more and more people can snap pictures or stream video from their cellphones directly to the web, the whole world starts watching in a whole new way. Perhaps the revolution will be televised afterall.
Andy Carvin has been providing great play by play on Twitter about the torch, pointing to qik videos of the protest, posing interesting questions and retweeting other fun comments from the microblogosphere. “Anyone wanna place bets when the first Free Mumia sign will be spotted at the SF torch protest?… retweeting @sacca: Ha! The Pro-China folks are being Rickrolled at high volume from an office window above Embarcadero!… retweeting @rockbandit: "I'll be honest. Its weird being at a protest in SF and not hearing 'no blood for oil'"
Andy wondered if he was “the only one who feels bad for the torch runners who may have dreamed a lifetime for the opportunity to run.” There is so much tied up in all of this. When Kim was a teenager, she had opportunity to either ride with the U.S. Olympic Equestrian Team or go to college. She chose college, but has a special place in her heart for those going to the Olympics, and I suspect for the torchbearers.
Yet the torch bearing ceremony has always been a lightning rod for protests. The famous Bong Hits 4 Jesus case was about students who unfurled that banner during the passing of an Olympic torch. Now, I’m reading in various reports that the modern Olympics didn’t have a torch ceremony until 1936. The Associated Press puts it this way.
The Olympic flame wasn’t part of the ancient games, and the torch relay didn’t become a fixture in the modern Olympics until the 1936 Berlin Games, when it was part of the Nazi pageantry that promoted Hitler’s beliefs of Aryan supremacy in the world of sports.
So, I wonder, will the bridge will be carried by Dustin Hoffman the wrong way across the upper level of the Bay Bridge; “And here's to you, Mrs. Robinson, Jesus loves you more than you will know.”
Wordless Wednesday
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 04/09/2008 - 14:16April 8th
New Haven Young Dems Meetinging
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 04/08/2008 - 21:13After a day of being mostly offline for a work project, I came home briefly to decided if I should continue my offline time by attending the New Haven Young Democrats meeting with Connecticut Democratic State Chair Nancy DiNardo.
I don’t really qualify as a young Democrat, but the topic was about conventions, not only the National Democratic Convention, but also stories about previous contested conventions in Connecticut as well as upcoming conventions. I’ve been particularly interested in the whole gamut of conventions, so I decided to stop by, hear what Nancy had to say, see some old friends, and perhaps make some new friends.
Nancy spoke about the 1994 State Convention and the competition between Bill Curry and John Larson for the Gubernatorial nomination. There was also a discussion of the 2006 State Convention with the contest between Joe Lieberman and Ned Lamont for the Senate nomination and the contest between John DeStefano and Dan Malloy for the Gubernatorial nomination.
Upcoming conventions, like the State Convention on May 10, and the Congressional Conventions on May 12th were also discussed. These conventions are unlikely to have contested races, but they are a great chance to experience conventions. The State Convention is expected to include a proposed rule change to the party that would expand State Central to include seats for Young Democrats.
Yet the big concern was what will happen at the National Convention. The general hope was that a clear nominee will emerge before the convention, yet various aspects of how the convention works in case it is contested were discussed. This included a brief discussion about members of the various standing committees, Rules, Platform and Credentials, and who will be representing Connecticut on these committees. The role of Superdelegates was also discussed. Nancy DiNardo, as State Chair is a superdelegate. She, along with Congressman Joe Courtney from the Second Congressional District, have not pledged support to either candidate at this point. She spoke of using her position as an uncommitted delegate to push the candidates to do the right things for the Democratic Party. This includes strongly encouraging them to focus their attacks on the Republican candidate, and not on each other, and in making sure that ‘blue states’ do not get overlooked during the general election campaign.
It was noted that residents of Connecticut often have family or friends living in battleground states, and working through these friendships can often be more effective that handing out material to strangers at malls. This lead to a discussion of the neighbor to neighbor program that Ms. DiNardo had brought brochures for. She also spoke credit card that you could get that would assist in fundraising for the State Democratic Party.
The discussion drifted to local candidates, including a great list of things that Rep. Rosa DeLauro has done for the district and the need to get new candidates to run for State Legislative offices that have had a Democrat run in recent years. The new campaign finance laws, together with what people hope will be a strong year for Democrats means that seats that seemed invulnerable in the past could be up for grabs this year.
All in all, it was a great meeting of the New Haven Young Dems, and even though I’m a bit old for the Young Dems, they are a great group and I look forward to hearing, and spreading the word about their future meetings.
April 7th
Understanding Erin
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 04/07/2008 - 11:36For the past couple of days, I’ve been trying to understand Erin. On the surface, it is a very simple, perhaps exaggerated, morality tale. A teenager gets pregnant, keeps the child. Four years later, the mother gets arrested for felony child neglect. Her son, at age four, weighs only ten pounds. This woman is the worst possible kind of monster, the sensational press tells us. Child neglect is extremely frightening. It pokes a dangerous whole in the ideas of self made men and powerless women.
We are not self-made. In our earliest years, we are absolutely dependent on the women that gave birth to us. We cannot survive without their nurturing, or the nurturing of someone they have handed us off to. These women are not powerless, they have more power than the male managers that we will work for years later. Our bosses can fire us. The first women in our lives can leave us to die.
Digging a little deeper, we find an even more complicated story. Erin’s son has lissencephaly, a rare birth defect. Children with this birth defect rarely make it past their second year. They have frequent convulsions and have difficulty absorbing food and medicine. Now, some extremists will suggest that this is Erin’s punishment for having had sex as a teenager. They are like the Pharisees asking Jesus who sinned, the blind man, or the blind man’s parents. Erin, like all of us, have done things in the past that we shouldn’t have done, that we aren’t proud of.
Yet, what did Erin do when she had a child with a birth defect? She sought help. She participated in leading network of people dealing with lissencephaly. She tried to find doctors that could understand and deal with this birth defect. For this, a couple of weeks after she brought her son to the hospital for medical help, she was arrested for child neglect.
If we believe we are all self-made and can overcome any adversity that is thrown at us, then we must believe that Erin is some sort of monster who didn’t try hard enough, or was at least some sort of failure. However, if we believe that we are all in this together, we need to see if there are other failures. Where was everyone else while Erin’s son was wasting away? Sure, there were people in the lissencephaly network that were helping Erin. There were researchers trying to understand lissencephaly and educate others about it.
Yet, where were the doctors, the social workers, the insurance companies, or even those in the faith-based community? Perhaps, it is easier to blame a teenage girl who is in over her head, than to look at our own failings. Perhaps that is the real reason she was arrested. Perhaps the way her story challenges the myths that we are self-made and that women are powerless is the reason the sensationalist media wants to spin a different story.
As I’ve explored this, I’ve spoken with people that have helped the parents of children with birth defects for years. They have told me that Erin’s story, sadly, is not that unusual. We don’t know how to deal with birth defects. They frighten us. They challenge our feelings of invulnerability. So, like the Pharisees, they we blame the parents.
On Thursday, the courts will hold a dependency hearing. Then, on April 16th, Erin is scheduled to be arraigned on the felony child neglect charges. My prayers go up for Erin and her son, that there might be forgiveness and healing. I also pray that we may all be convicted (in the religious sense) of our own culpability in not doing enough to prevent the neglect of children, whether they have birth defects or not, that is intrinsic in the system.
(For more information, read my previous post about Erin and lissencephaly).