Archive - Mar 2010
March 21st
Bone Marrow Registration Drive
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 03/21/2010 - 10:18Today, I received Facebook invitation to a Bone Marrow Registration Drive in Milford, CT.
It will take place at Live Oaks Elementary, 575 Merwin Avenue, Milford from 3:30 to 7:30 PM.
It is a simple, painless procedure of filling out some forms and getting a cheek swab done.
You can find more information about the drive in Connecticut Post.
March 20th
The First Day of Spring
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sat, 03/20/2010 - 19:00After Kim and I dropped Fiona off at a birthday party, we drove down to Greenwich to attend a memorial service for David Hale Roberson, who died unexpectedly a couple of weeks ago at the young age of forty-two. Although Kim has been fighting a cold and my allergies have been acting up a little, it couldn’t have been a nicer day for a drive. As we left Fiona at the party we saw plenty of crocuses poking through. The sun was shining. Traffic was light, only slowed down at times by construction crews still cleaning up after last weekend’s storm.
It had rained heavily in Woodbridge last weekend, and we had gotten high wind warnings, but the storm had passed without much damage. As we headed down the Merritt, we saw a different story. Crews were everywhere cleaning up the wreckage. Friends had been without power for days and some schools were closed for several days running.
In Greenwich, it seemed that everyone was out enjoying the weather after the long week of cleaning up after the storm, many without power for much of the time. We arrived at First Presbyterian Church around half an hour before the service. Already it was very crowded and we nodded solemnly to various friends that we saw sitting in the church.
Sitting near the front was an old friend, David A. Stevenson. David and I knew Dave through politics and both of them were helpful to Kim when she ran for State Rep back in 2004. In turn, we helped David in his 2008 State Rep race. David had used Fanfare for the Common Man as his campaign theme, and I chuckled as I saw that it was the final piece of music in the prelude to Dave’s funeral.
People chatted in hushed tones during much of the prelude as the ushers tried find space for everyone who was attending. Dave was only forty-two when he died, and I was struck by how many of the people were so much older than he was. Yes, you expect some of that when someone is taken far too early, but it also reflected Dave’s impact on the community of Greenwich.
As the timpani sounded at the start of Fanfare for the Common Man, a hush fell over the congregation. The majestic music in a beautiful church, celebrating the common man was very appropriate. There was nothing common about Dave, including his commitment to help common people.
After the Greeting and the Call to Worship, the congregation sang “Our God, Our Help in Ages Past”. It is a wonderful hymn. As I looked searched for the lyrics online, I found a note: “This hymn was sung at the funeral of former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in St. Paul’s Cathedral, London, 1965.” Somehow, that seems appropriate as well.
There was a Prayer for Illumination followed by a lesson from the Hebrew Psalter. It is that wonderful version of Psalm 91, “And he will raise you up on eagle’s wing, bear you on the breath of the dawn, make you to shine like the sun, and hold you in the palm of his hand.”
There was supposed to be a tribute to Dave’s life of service by Congressman James A. Himes. However, Congressman Himes was busy doing what Dave had fought so hard for Jim to be able to do. Congressman Himes was in Washington working on health care reform.
In the video, Congressman Himes spoke about the ‘moral dimension’ of the health care debate, the understanding that at the core of that moral dimension is the belief that we look after our own. Dave Roberson epitomized looking after our own. It was his personal cause, and it led him to eventually become chair of the Democratic Town Committee in Greenwich, CT.
Yet there was another side to the story. Dave did not have health insurance. He had a heart condition. I don’t know if the heart condition was what prevented him from obtaining health insurance. I don’t know if the heart condition is what led to his fatal crash after speaking at the Representative Town Meeting in Greenwich that fateful night. If we had a health care system that better reflected the moral dimension of our country, and our belief that we look after our own, then perhaps, Kim and I would not have needed to go to the memorial service today.
So, Congressman Himes stayed in Washington to fight the good fight and sent an aide to read his statement on the life and work of Dave Roberson. The aide was also close to Dave and choked back tears as she read Congressman Himes’ statement.
After a musical offering and a couple lessons from the Christian Scriptures, The Reverend William A. Evertsberg offered a brief homily. It was humorous and touching and reflected years of discussions that Dave and his family have had as members of the First Presbyterian Church with the senior minister.
Dave was a rare breed; a brilliant scientist, a science fiction writer, and a man on deep religious faith. There were jokes about sending your kids to Sunday School at First Presbyterian so they might grow up to be rocket scientists like Dave was. There were comments about how Dave’s first words when he meets his maker are likely to be something like, “Are you registered to vote?” It was a brilliant homily.
After another musical offering and a Prayer of Thanksgiving, the congregation sang the closing hymn, “For All the Saints”.
Thou wast their Rock, their Fortress and their Might;
Thou, Lord, their Captain in the well fought fight;
Thou, in the darkness drear, their one true Light.
These words seem to capture Dave in many different ways.
I grew up a Congregationalist, not far from the Presbyterians in theological outlook, and there was something comforting to me about the reception following in Fellowship Hall after the service. The stalwart Church Ladies set out plates of heaping food as old friends ran into each other and reflected on Dave’s life.
Nancy DiNardo, chair of the Connecticut Democratic Party was there. Gubernatorial candidates Ned Lamont and Dan Malloy were both there along with various staffers. One expressed the politically correct reservations about talking politics at the memorial service and Kim just rolled her eyes. If ever there was a memorial service where politics should be discussed, it was this one. Dave would have been honored as well as in the thick of the discussion.
Another person commented on attending memorial services and finding out so much that they never knew about their departed friend and wishing they had an opportunity to speak with the dearly departed in the light of the new found common interests.
The golden evening brightens in the west;
Soon, soon to faithful warriors comes their rest;
Sweet is the calm of paradise the blessed.
Kim and I bid are farewell to old friends and headed back to Woodbridge. Outside, the streets were crowded with many enjoying the beautiful first day of spring, seemingly unaware of the passing of such a great man. Now I have my moment to reflect and to write. Rest In Peace, Dave.
But lo! there breaks a yet more glorious day;
The saints triumphant rise in bright array;
March 19th
#PCCT - PodCamp Connecticut, Planning Stages
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 11:51Last night a dozen or so social media enthusiasts gathered in Rocky Hill to share ideas about organizing an unconference about social media in Connecticut. Many of the participants had been to various Podcamps and some had been to other forms of unconferences. Just about everyone already knew each other from CT Tweet Crawls and other social media gatherings. We discussed several issues; should this be a ‘PodCamp’, which is a well known brand trademarked by the PodCamp Foundation? Should it be a Social Media Camp, or some other form of BarCamp? How strictly should it follow the ‘unconference’ format? What, in the end, are we trying to get out of this?
One of the issues is that many of the people already heavily involved in social media have been to PodCamps, BarCamps or related events. There are PodCamps in Boston, Western Mass., New York City and beyond. What would make PodCamp Connecticut special?
Suzi Craig came up with a great suggestion, focusing on, “Work, Live, Play, Connecticut”. How does social media affect our lives here in Connecticut?
For the news industry, the affect is profound. People are now getting their news online. They are sharing information, both that they have gathered, and pointers to interesting stories they have found via social media. The news industry is still struggling with how best to respond to the affects of social media.
Yet other companies need to think about this as well. Word of mouth has always been the best advertising, and now word of mouth is taking place online. How do businesses effectively join in on the conversation in a way that it helps their business?
This leads us nicely to the ‘Play’ aspect of Suzi’s suggestion. People use social media to decide what bar, restaurant, or events to go to. They organize Tweetcrawls to gather with friends at preselected venues. Wise businesses will try to get on the Tweetcrawler’s radar and become a desired destination. People planning other events are wise to try and use social media in a similar manner to draw people to their events.
Another profession, very closely tied to where we live that has always relied on personal networks is realtors. More and more realtors are recognizing the power of social media as a tool to grow their personal networks.
The goal of PodCamp Connecticut is to draw together around three hundred people from all walks of life to share their thoughts, ideas and experiences of social media and how it affects where we work, play and live.
This then comes to the format. I often comment about being an unconference purist. Every session should be a discussion with a facilitator and note taker, but no presentations. A good unconference starts off with a brief discussion setting the framework for the day and doing very quick introductions. I like the style of each person saying their name, where they’re from and three words about themselves, very quickly and moving on. This can work with very large crowds and be very revealing.
Then, people write ideas for sessions they would like to attend on sheets of paper. The sheets get sorted, duplicates combined and the most popular put on a board to list when and where the topic will be discussed. People go to a session and talk about what they are interested in. If they aren’t interested, they exercise the rule of two feet, walk out, and find a session that fits them better.
This is one of the reasons why presentations generally don’t work well at unconferences. The items to be discussed need to be what everyone in the room is looking for, and not some preconceived idea that a presenter has. Too often, I’ve seen people set on doing presentations be disappointed because people don’t want to listen to their presentations. They either interrupt and pull the session back to a discussion that doesn’t follow the presentation, or they simply walk out.
Yet this approach of unconferences is new to many people, and some people find the idea challenging to start with. However, when they think about so many conferences where they’ve sat and listened to a panel talk for forty-five minutes, with the only real value coming with the statements from the audience, converted Jeopardy-style, to questions for the Q&A during the last ten minutes, they often quickly realize the value of the unconference.
Will this group of social media enthusiasts be able to pull off a successful unconference about social media in Connecticut? If there is any group of people that can pull it off, this group seems well positioned. In addition, experienced campers from other PodCamps and BarCamps in the surrounding area are offering to help out. Given the interest in Tweet Crawls and other social media gatherings here in Connecticut, it seems like a great crowd can be gathered. I sure hope so. I’m looking forward to it.
Running Java on an #N900
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 03/19/2010 - 08:49One of the first questions I came up against when I started working with the Nokia N900 was, “Can it run Java?” According to the Java page on the Maemo Wiki, the answer was, “It’s not supported, but here are a few things you can try.” So, I poked around and made a little progress.
March 18th
Making Connecticut More Business Friendly
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 03/18/2010 - 13:40As the economy struggles along, people are asking how to help make Connecticut more ‘Business Friendly’, yet it seems as if few people are really exploring what a more business friendly state is. The standard definition seems to be less regulations and less taxes, but the consequences of this seem at best, not considered.
One example of this ill thought out position came when Republicans immediately attacked Attorney General Richard Blumenthal when he suggested that enforcing the laws of the state makes for a better business environment, or in other words, helps make the state more Business Friendly. Apparently, they believe that being business friendly does not include making sure people obey the law.
Likewise, the Connecticut Business and Industry Association worked hard for deregulation of the electricity market here in Connecticut, arguing that increased competition would lower the price of electricity. However, we have ended up with one of the highest electricity rates in the country, hurting businesses and making Connecticut less business friendly.
Where did this go wrong? Perhaps some of it is this unfounded belief that increased competition is always beneficial. It appears as if what we have gotten are electricity supplier to compete with one another on how to get highest profit from consumers as opposed to driving down prices.
The issue is that competition is too often a zero sum game. It is one business competing with another and as one wins, others lose. Instead of competing to affect the distribution of profits and control which regulations protects which businesses or consumers, competition needs to be promoting innovation.
We see something similar in the opposition to Paid Sick Days. Businesses don’t want to be responsible for maintaining a safe work environment for their employees. That is unnecessary regulation they claim, it is unfunded mandates. Yet these regulations protect not only the employees of companies, but also customers of these companies. As an example, employees often eat at local restaurants during their lunches. To the extent that companies are not required to provide paid sick days to their employees, restaurants are more likely to have sick employees handling food and spreading sickness to the employees of other companies. This is not business friendly.
It also reflects another mindset that seems to be damaging businesses in Connecticut, as well as across our country, the focus on short term profits as opposed to long term health of a company. I know that there are several restaurants that my wife and I will not go to because we have gotten sick after eating food from those restaurants. It is not clear if the restaurants had lax preparation guidelines, or we simply got sick from a stomach bug spread by a worker that could not take a paid sick day off. The short term focus on reducing costs of employee benefits is penny wise and pound foolish as companies drive away customers.
As a final point, the reduction of taxes results in a reduction of governmental services. Retail oriented businesses understand that they need good roads coming their stores. They understand that they need protection in case of theft or fire. The wise business people even realize that they need an Attorney General who will protect honest business people from those that are out to take unfair advantage over others.
So, how do we make Connecticut a little more business friendly? Perhaps the first step is to stop and think a little more seriously about what really makes a state more business friendly instead of reiterating the tired old platitudes about less regulation and less taxes.