Building a DIY USB LED Chandelier
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sat, 02/04/2012 - 18:41Recently, a friend was talking about LED lighting and I spent a little time looking into LED lighting options. Starting at about ten dollars a bulb, you can get LED light bulbs that fit into a standard screw base light bulb socket. These lights use between 6 and 12 watts and are much more efficient than traditional incandescent light bulbs. They are little more efficient than compact fluorescent bulbs, but last much longer without some of the disposal issues.
Yet a lot of the efficiency seems to be lost in trying to get them to behave like traditional light bulbs. Instead, if we used different power sources, we might be able to get much better efficiency. I thought about the Syrcadian Blue light that Kim got me. It runs 25 blue LEDs off of a mini-USB connection. Could better, more efficient lighting be done using USB connections?
So, I started looking around for ideas. The first blog post I found was USB LED Light. It was right along the idea that I was thinking of. It used a 10,000 mcd white LED. The author calculated that putting it together with a 100 ohm resistor would work fine, and he goes through what he did to make it. He notes that with a 100 ohm resistor, the light draws 15.47 mA, well below the 500 mA limit for USB. All nice and good, but what if you want to have more than one LED? What if you use a different LED? How do you calculate the appropriate resistors or the best wiring?
Looking around, I found another blog post, DIY USB LED Keyboard Light. This one used a 5000 mcd orange LED. It went into details about how to know the positive and negative side of an LED, and most importantly, provided a link to a .
The author notes that the voltage range for USD is 4.75-5.3 Volts, and it is best to use 5 volts in the calculator. I did some searching to find some good LEDs to use. SuperBrightLEDs had this listing, a 30 degree 18,000 mcd cool white LED. With a forward voltage of 3.4 votes and continuous Forward Current of 30 mA, I plugged the values into the calculator.
My first pass was to see if I could create something with 25 LEDs, however the calculator came up with an array that would draw 750 mA, 50% higher than recommended for USB. 16 LEDs would take 480 mA, a little close for comfort for my initial calculations. 12 LEDs would take 360 mA. That sounds reasonable. The array of LEDs would draw 1828 mW and would use 12 1/4 watt 56 ohm resistors.
The LEDs are 89 cents each when buying between 10 and 99 LEDs, and it looks like all electronics has the resistors at five cents each when buying a dozen.
I also recently got into a discussion with a friend that was looking buying a chandelier. So, I started thinking, could I take this and build a DIY LED chandelier? Looking on Amazon, I found lots of interesting crystal ball options. You can buy 40 mm crystal balls for $2.72 each. 20 mm for $2.22 each, 50 mm for $6.98 and 70 mm teardrop crystals for $4.54. This would probably be the most expensive part of the project, ranging from $25 to $85 depending on what to use.
The only other part would be the wire, the frame and any other pieces to put this together. So, for around $50 to $100 it may be possible to create a very interesting DIY USB LED chandelier. On the other hand, I suspect it might not give a lot of light. Each LED gives off 4 lumens, so 12 of them would be 48 lumens, It might be good for ambient lighting, but not much else.
What do you think? Does this make sense? Have I missed something or done my calculations wrong? Should I give this a try? Should I try different combinations, like a narrower viewing angle or a different color temperature
#ff @mmpartee @JoeCascio @CherylBudge @paulbogush @jcnork
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 02/03/2012 - 20:30It is Friday evening. I am exhausted after a long week, and don't especially feel like writing about following anyone. But I didn't do a Follow Friday blog post last week, and I haven't written anything else today, so I figure I should try to power through a post.
This week, I am focusing on Podcamps. Starting the list is @mmpartee, one of the folks behind Podcamp WesternMass. I've been to a few of these Podcamps, and the next one is coming up at the end of February. I'll probably try to make it to that one as well.
Next on the list is @JoeCascio. I'm not sure exactly how I first met Joe, but we run in very similar circles and I've seen him at various podcamps. He was instrumental in helping get the first Connecticut Podcamp going, and when it was over, I hung out with him and @CherylBudge for drinks at a nearby bar. Cheryl is another member of the social media scene in Connecticut whom it seems like I've always known, but I'm just not sure when or where I first met her.
@paulbogush is an educator living in a neighboring town and teaching in a different neighboring town. He's one of the teachers that gets social media and I wish there were more teachers like him.
Rounding out the list is @jcnork. Like the rest of them, Jack and I have known each other for quite a while. He's helping get the next Podcamp in Connecticut off the ground. He also is the force behind the Lodge Music series in Bethany. The next performance is Saturday night. If people are feeling well enough and there is enough energy here, we'll try to make it.
The C Word
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 02/02/2012 - 20:11Today, a friend of mine left work early to take his sister to the doctor. They think she has cancer. My grandmother died of cancer, my wife's mother died of cancer, and more recently, friends and relatives of mine have successfully fought cancer.
I work at a health center which does incredible work with underserved populations and has a really important early detection program. As a nonprofit organization, we need to stay out of partisan politics. It is difficult these days, because health care has become so politicized.
I work in communications, particularly with social media, so I watch closely when organizations falter in their communications and especially when they fail at social media.
So, with all of this, I've been watching, with morbid fascination, the Susan G. Komen fiasco. There are so many things wrong with this, it is just astounding. Politicians and celebrities have come out to lambast the Komen foundation.
It is tempting to pile on, but there's already too much negative energy around. So, instead, we should look for ways to turn this into something positive.
Part of the Komen foundation's rationale is that they want to make their grants more efficient. A good way to do that is to completely bypass the Komen foundation. Give money directly to Planned Parenthood and other organizations doing cancer screening. Also, consider giving money to organizations supporting research. I'm trying to find the best one to support. It seems like The Breast Cancer Research Foundation may be a better place to donate to.
Working in health care social media, I've gotten to know more about the Mayo Clinic and theirWomen's Cancer Program, and they seem like another organization well worth supporting. They are one of 11 programs that are part of the National Cancer Institute's Specialized Programs of Research Excellence. You can find the other institutions on the Breast SPOREs page.
There is a lot of negative energy around 'The C Word', but we can call cancer by its name, and not get caught up in the negative energy. Instead, we should focus on prevention, through organizations like Planned Parenthood and Federally Qualified Health Centers, and on research through organizations, like those that participate in the National Cancer Institute's Specialized Programs of Research Excellence.
Rabbit, Rabbit, Rabbit
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 19:48I try to start the first blog post of each month with Rabbit, Rabbit, Rabbit, harkening back to the childhood belief that this would bring good luck for the month. I believe at other times, I've referenced the old Russian adage, "chase two rabbits, catch none". I feel like I've been chasing rabbits recently.
At the start of the year, I wanted to spend time exploring some open online curricula such as Introduction to Theory of Literature, which I've touched upon a little bit. There have also been politics as we enter a presidential election year. I've been doing a little more genealogy, and I've been tied up with writing about a family trip to my niece's wedding and various other topics, so I haven't returned to that. This, together with some of my work related discussions has led me to start exploring open source genomics, which I hope to be writing more about soon.
So, I feel like I'm at the "Chase two rabbits, catch none" phase. On top of this, it is Wordless Wednesday, and I ought to post a photograph as well. Yet I'm still exhausted. I haven't recuperated from the trip and work has been very busy.
More later...
Meta-Cyberchondria
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 01/31/2012 - 21:03In American Medical News yesterday, there was an article, Cyberchondria: the one diagnosis patients miss. It refers to a Pew Research Center survey that found eight in ten Americans use the Internet to look for health information. It also referred to research from Microsoft which found that nine in ten respondents reported at least one instance where their search of online health information led them to review content about more serious illnesses.
The article goes on to say, "More often, though, the large number of health websites, some of which are unreliable, mislead patients into thinking they have a medical problem, say health professionals." This is where the article really falls apart. Which health professionals are they referring to? Is this based on peer-reviewed data or simply on the gut feeling of a couple doctors who were friends of the article's author who don't like people doing their own online search?
Even the use of the Microsoft research seems suspect. When attempting to get information about a condition, it seems reasonable to look at conditions that present similar symptoms to be able to properly differentiate between different conditions. This research might lead patients into thinking they have a medical condition or it might simply help the patient be more prepared in discussing the symptoms.
It seems as if, at the root of this is the question of who knows best? Does a patient's knowledge of their own body and symptoms outweigh the years of experience a doctor has gained? Does the information a patient can gain online change this equation, either for the better or for the worse?
How real a problem is Cyberchondria, and how real is 'Meta-Cyberchondria', some sort of fear doctors have about patients coming in and either having false information or more information than the doctors?