Tweaking Twitter
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 04/14/2008 - 09:20This morning, with the unread emails in my mailbox falling below 400, with all of the emails that have come in since last Wednesday at least read, if not responded to, I figured I could take a few moments out to explore twitter a little more.
Some of this was because each morning I go through the half dozen or so new people that are following me on Twitter. In most cases, they are the Twitter Spammers. ‘SEO experts’ that are following 2437 people and six people are following them.
I’m currently followed by around 500 people and I follow around 300. It feels like a manageable crowd. When I am at home, I receive my tweets via Second Life, which I normally have open as a fancy IM client and screen saver on my number two computer. If TwitterBox is down in Second Life, I check recent twitters on the web. When I’m away from my computer for an extended period I turn on following on my cell phone. My pattern for sending tweets is similar, although I also send many tweets through Twitter feed, every time I update my blog.
Two tools that I played with today for exploring Twitter more deeply are Twubble and TwitterLocal. Twubble searches your friends and finds people who are friends of many of your friends. The big names in online social networks typically show up. Everyone has added folks like jasoncalacanis, davewiner, scobleizer to their friends list. Each time I run Twubble, I find another half dozen people that I should start following.
Over at TwitterLocal, I check to see who is saying what in my neighborhood. I live in a suburban area, so I’m looking at everyone who lives within 10 miles of my zipcode. I did stumble across one person in a neighboring town that I will probably start following once he returns on my radar.
Enough playing with Twitter, on to other tasks for the day.
Northwest Leadership Breakfast
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 04/13/2008 - 10:36If you want to represent the Northwestern part of Connecticut as a Democrat in Hartford or Washington, then the place to be each April is the Northwest Leadership Breakfast. For the third year in a row, this breakfast has been held at the house of Audrey and Matt Blondin in Litchfield, CT. This year, over 100 Democratic leaders from the area gathered to listen to State Chair Nancy DiNardo, the four Constitutional officers, candidates for State Senate, members of unions and advocacy groups, and notable speakers, Rep. Chris Murphy, Mayor Dan Malloy, and former U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont.
Audrey Blondin, a member of the Democratic State Central Committee, representing the 30th District, was joined by State Central committeewoman Myrna Watanabe of the 8th district and State Central Committeewoman Sharon Sherman of the 32rd district in organizing the event, and setting an example of the leadership we should expect from all State Central members.
After introductory remarks, Nancy DiNardo addressed the group, encouraging everyone to attend the Jefferson Jackson Bailey Dinner to be held on April 28th. She then read a letter from Sen. Dodd who apologized for not being able to attend the gathering but noted that “If anyone can bring out Democrats, it is Audrey Blondin”. His letter went on to talk about key issues, housing, jobs, health care, and education. It spoke about efforts to reform the No Child Left Behind act, and Sen. Dodd’s work on a call to national service.
The constitutional officers spoke in the order in which they arrived. Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz spoke first and thanked President Bush for helping people in Connecticut register thousands and thousands of new Democrats. During the 2006 Lamont-Lieberman race, over 30,000 new voters were registered. This year’s Presidential primary brought in an additional 35,000 voters and since the primary an additional 20,000 voters have registered. Of this last batch, 10,000 were Democrats, 8,000 were unaffiliated and 2,000 belonged to other parties. 4,500 of the new voters were between the ages of 18 and 29, and amongst these newly registered voters, Democrats outnumber Republicans six to one. Ms. Bysiewicz also spoke about the battle to stop Broadwater and the continuing fight for ethics in government.
Next to speak was State Comptroller Nancy Wyman. She focused on the efforts by the Democratic Leadership to keep present a tight budget, meeting the needs of the people of Connecticut, while avoiding waste. She noted the efforts of many people, including both municipal leaders and leaders of unions to bring about a significant reduction in the health care costs for municipal workers. These reductions work out to be around $60 per person per month.
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal spoke about the necessity of providing checks and balances. He noted that three people die each week in Connecticut because they lack health care. He spoke about suits that he has brought against insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies as part of his efforts to address this grave injustice.
Connecticut, according to Attorney General Blumenthal, has the most expensive electricity in the whole nation, double the national average. We need a safe, sane and comprehensive energy policy, one that focuses on renewable energy, as opposed to supporting ill thought out proposals such as Broadwater. He spoke about our stewardship obligations in preserving Long Island sound and in at least not leaving our state in worse shape than we found it. Most importantly, he noted, he didn’t stop Broadwater, nor did Secretary of State Bysiewicz or their counterparts in New York. It was citizen advocates, like everyone in the Blondin’s house, that stopped Broadwater and he thanked everyone.
Moving on to the national scene, Attorney General Blumenthal said he was an old fashioned sort of guy that believes that the President of the United States should obey the law. That is why he has brought various suits against the administration for their failures on issues such as No Child Left Behind and on climate change. We need people that will force the administration to obey the laws.
State Treasurer Denise Nappier started off by talking about how this coming presidential election is the most important in several decades as we seek for a leader than can start undoing the damage caused by the Bush administration. One place where that damage is noticeable in her job is in the current financial market dislocation.
In better times, a key focus of the State Treasurer’s job is to maximize return on the State’s investments. Yet with the current turmoil, it is important to focus on protecting capital.
She spoke extensively about the Teachers’ Retirement Fund 2008 Series bonds. She described these bonds as historic, well timed and critically needed. The bond issue received bi-partisan support. In the larger picture, they are part of an effort to commit the state to meeting its long term financial obligations.
Another focus for Treasurer Nappier has been shareholder activism. Ford Motor Company recently made a major commitment to reducing greenhouse gases. That commitment came as a response to shareholder activism, including pressures from various state funds, including Connecticut’s.
She noted that her efforts were an attempt to make a difference from around the kitchen tables of people in Connecticut to around the boardroom tables of companies across our country.
After the constitutional officers spoke, George Jepsen, immediate past chairman of the Connecticut Democratic Party and the former state Senate majority leader added his comments about strengthening the Democratic Party in Connecticut.
Mr. Jepsen was followed by Art House, who has set up an exploratory committee for a possible run for State Senate in the 8th State Senate district. Mr. House noted that up until he spoke, he assumed everyone knew all of the speakers, but he suspected many people didn’t know his background. He spoke about his early days working for Abe Ribicoff and his recent support of Ned Lamont.
He noted that while Connecticut is ranked first in per capital income, it is ranked 44th in growth and last in retaining its youth. Mr. House noted that fundraising for his exploratory committee has been strong and should he decide to accept the nomination, he hopes that with the new public financing rules, he will be able to quickly complete his fundraising around the time of the convention and focus on meaningful discussions with the voters in the Eighth State Senate District.
Michael Renzullo spoke next. He has an exploratory committee set up as he considers running for State Senate in the 30th State Senate District. Mr. Renzullo is the Northeast Regional Manager for American Solar Roof. He spoke about the importance of a better energy policy in Connecticut and also spoke briefly about the importance of better for funding stem cell research in Connecticut. He energetically worked the room, introducing himself and seeking donations.
Later in the program, Matt Brennan, who ran for State Senate in the 30th State Senate District in 2006 spoke up. Last time, he received a third of the vote, having raised only $2,000. He believed that with public financing this time around, he could win and announced his plans for an exploratory committee.
John McCarthy who is running for State Senate in the 32nd State Senate District was not at the gathering, although he did have material there as well as people working the room on his behalf.
Connie Razza, education and outreach coordinator of 1000 Friends of Connecticut then spoke. 1,000 Friends is an organization committed to smart growth in Connecticut, “preserving, conserving and growing smart”.
Ms. Razza spoke about the need to reform property taxes in Connecticut. Towns in Connecticut are more dependent on property taxes than in any other state in the country. By reforming the property tax structure, towns will be more able to work together to make sure that the growth in Connecticut “serves the economy, the community and the environment.”
State Representative Roberta Willis then took the floor. She spoke about the importance of the new public financing of campaigns. The Connecticut General Assembly was the first legislature to vote in public financing by themselves, instead of being forced by a referendum or other actions. She spoke how the law makes it much easier for people to run for office and hopes that it will encourage more competition in seats that traditionally go unchallenged. Candidates for State Representative need to receive donations from 150 people in towns in their district. Rep. Willis suggested that a low dollar spaghetti dinner is a wonderful way to reach donors and noted the wonderful aspect of grassroots campaign that the new public funding of elections encourages.
This provided a great segue for U.S. Representative Chris Murphy. Rep. Murphy spoke about his victory coming as a result of good old-fashioned grassroots manpower. He spoke about addressing issues like universal health care or protecting our national security by protecting our constitution. These are issues, he said, that we can talk best about when we speak with voters eye to eye.
Mayor Dan Malloy, who has now successfully paid down his campaign debt from 2006, acknowledged the importance of being seen at the Northwest Leadership Breakfast and spoke about perhaps having a chance to run for another statewide office in the future. Yet he also spoke about another important aspect of the breakfast. The energy in the room was palpable and Mayor Malloy spoke about coming to the breakfast to get his batteries recharged.
I was asked to introduce Ned Lamont. Ned needs no introduction, and the breakfast had been going on for quite a while, so I tried to keep my remarks brief. I mentioned how Kim had first met Ned back in 2004 when she was running for State Representative. I spoke about how Gov. Dean had encouraged his supporters to consider running for office, and I repeated that encouragement to everyone in the room. With that, Ned Lamont briefly took the floor.
He spoke about the importance of standing up for what is right and his belief that we will take our country back. With the speeches over, attendees mingled, talked, and tried to encourage each other to run for office. Slowly, the crowds departed, some heading off to hear Rep. Murphy speak at Heritage Village in Southbury, others to enjoy the beautiful day, and some, hopefully, to consider running for office.
It is not clear who will run for which office in the coming years, but it is clear that Connecticut Democrats are blessed with many great potential candidates and it was a wonderful time to hear many of them at the third annual Northwest Leadership Breakfast.
Understanding Tori, from the playgrounds to the killing fields
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sat, 04/12/2008 - 17:48What is up with those girls from Florida? It seems like a question a lot of people are asking, at least rhetorically. I put a blog post up about Victoria ‘Tori’ Lindsey yesterday, and it’s already been viewed at least 500 times. Now for a megablog, that isn’t a big thing. They get 500 views in the blink of an eye. But, on my humble little blog, that’s a lot. So, what is the story of Tori and the other girls? It seems like there must be more to the story.
I wrote something similar as I tried to understand Erin Markes, the 19 year old mother from Florida who has been accused of neglecting her 4 year old son. As with that case, I don’t have any more details than anyone else searching the Internet could come up with, but I do have one thing different, a desire to try and understand what is going on in other people’s minds, a desire to get a broader perspective.
Is that what people who came to my previous post about Tori are looking for? Is that what people who are reading this post are looking for? How do we understand this in our own contexts?
So, I’ve spent a bit of time surfing around. I’m not sure I have any great insights into what went on, what is going on with our country, or what people are looking for online, but let me take a shot at some of this.
Mostly, what I am reading is horror and disgust. I read about the parents of the attackers receiving death threats, and I find phone numbers and addresses of the girls. I kicked around calling people to see if anyone would comment. But the parents, I am sure, have been harassed enough, and the girls are under a gag order.
One headline I saw asked, ‘Could your teen be next?’ Yeah. That is a fear that I suspect every parent has. You hear about a beating like that, you hear about a gunman shooting up a school, and you worry about if your teen could be next. Typically, the worry is about one’s kid being a victim. Yet another worry, that I wish more parents would worry about, is if their kid could be an attacker.
I don’t know what the situation was with Tori and her parents, or any of the other girls and their parents, but a recurring theme is, “What was wrong with those parents?” “Why didn’t those parents teach their kids right from wrong?”
I hope and believe none of my daughters would ever be caught in either side of a situation like Tori’s. I hope and believe they know that I love them, and will do whatever I can to help them through difficult times, but also that there are behaviors that are simply not tolerated. I wish more parents had these kinds of hopes and beliefs. I do know how hard it can be to raise teenage girls. I have two of them which present special challenges to me.
I read other comments. A law enforcement officials’ blog, where they compare notes of teens they’ve had to deal with and share their thoughts about the case.
I read news reports with the standard lines where the parents and friends of the attackers talk about how they were good kids and they just didn’t understand how this could have happened. I remember hearing one journalism professor talking about how this has become a cliché and it reflects sloppy journalism.
As I read comments like this, Tom Petty’s Free Fallin comes to mind
She's a good girl, loves her mama
Loves Jesus, and America too
She's a good girl, crazy 'bout Elvis
Loves horses, and her boyfriend too
It goes on to talk about “And the good girls are home with broken hearts”. Was this part of it? Some reports I’ve read indicate that it started over stuff being said on a MySpace page about a boy, and suggested that there was some sort of love triangle going on.
I don’t know if its true, but it sure fits a familiar narrative. Perhaps there is even a little bit about conflict between cliques, you know, a little Montague and Capulet action going on. “There’s a place for us…” People forget that Romeo and Juliet are cast at around that age, and the great remake, West Side Story is all about high school.
It is a trying time, love, emotions that seem overwhelming and out of control. The group of close friends, BFF. And then, the imagined invulnerability. Sure, you can put a video on the Internet of you severely beating up another person and not land in jail, just like you drink until you can’t stand, and still be able to drive home safely.
So, the newspaper articles talk about the defendants. Some hid behind their long hair. Some started to tear up. Others looked angrily at photographers. Still others smiled or even laughed.
As I read the comments, people are looking for a teachable moment. They want these kids thrown behind bars and the keys thrown away. They want the harshest possible punishment, to let other kids know that this isn’t acceptable behavior. If I thought that would prevent something like this from happening again, I might agree. But I just don’t think it would be an effective deterrent.
Instead, I hope that these kids have the best lawyers possible. I’m not talking about lawyers that can help the kids avoid responsibility for what they have done. No, I hope that they have lawyers that say something like,
“I don’t know if you really understand how serious this is. You could go to jail for life, and you would not be very safe there.” I hope that the lawyers would continue on with something like, “Showing remorse is not going to be good enough. There are people that want to give you a beating a hundred times worse than you gave Tori.” Then, the discussion would move to how to make real reparations.
These reparations would probably start off with some serious psychotherapy, getting the kids to understand what they did, why they did it and why some many people want the harshest possible retribution. Beyond that, how do you make real reparations?
Perhaps, a good starting point would be for them to learn about their actions taken to the extreme, when one group of people attempts to deliberately and systematically destroy another group of people; genocide. The slaughter of Armenians during World War I, the Assyrians massacred in Iraq in 1933, the holocaust, Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia, Darfur.
Perhaps, if one of these kids could become a leading spokesperson against all kinds of bullying, from the scuffle in the schoolyard playground to the genocidal killing fields around the world, then, perhaps, just perhaps, there can be real reparations, and meaning can be salvaged from a horrid meaningless crime.
No, I don’t understand Tori, what was going on with her parents, her friends, any sort of romantic interests or even with herself. Nor do I understand what was going on with the kids that participated in the beating. Likewise, I do not understand how genocide can happen, and how countries can stand idly by, sponsoring athletic games, while at the same time sponsoring companies in countries that practice genocide.
There is a lot I don’t understand, but maybe that is the problem for all of us. Maybe none of us really understand the people around us as well as we should. Maybe we take the easy way out, by reading the stories and expressing our frustration, and not trying to understand.
If you’ve made it this far, thank you. Perhaps we can all work together to seek greater understanding.
Victoria Lindsey, Erin Markes and Avery Doninger
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 04/11/2008 - 13:11Three teenage women provide very different insights into the use of the Internet by today’s youth.
Yesterday, Erin Markes, 19, appeared in court in a child dependency hearing to find out if she would get her four year old son, who suffers from lissencephaly back from the state. She entered a formal denial of her child neglect charges at the hearing and another hearing is scheduled for May 5. Ms. Markes is also scheduled to be arraigned on charges of child neglect on April 16th. Led by members of the Lissencephaly Network, there is a petition to Exonerate Erin and Give her child back.
While others have been using the Internet to plead Erin’s case, Dianne Fitzgerald, president of the Lissencephaly Network, and the person who started the petition reported that Erin had made use of the networks online forum to seek help in how to care for her child.
The second young woman I would like to highlight is Avery Doninger. I’ve written a lot about her case. She is the student that referred to ‘the douchebags at the central office’, was banned from the ballot on a school election and now is awaiting a ruling by the Second Circuit on her case. While the word ‘douchebag’ may not have been the best word to use in the blog post, it was part of an effort, including a mass emailing, to get people more involved in the school district. The response by the administration seems to be more about trying to discourage student involvement that it is about choice of words.
This leads us to the third young woman online. Victoria Lindsey, according to some other girls was ‘talking trash’ online. She was severely beaten, with the beating being video taped and placed online. The girls doing the beating are now facing twenty years to life in prison. For details, see the blog post on ProgressiveU: Victoria Lindsey Beating and the commentary by Shelly Palmer on Jack Meyer’s site, What We Can Learn From Eight Florida Teens.
Each of these stories tells us a little bit about how the Internet can be used for good or ill and how people may respond appropriately or inappropriately to content online.
So, my thoughts go out to Erin, Avery and Tori as they all deal with their moments of fame, amplified by the Internet.
Updates
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 04/10/2008 - 14:17For a brief moment, earlier today, it felt like I was catching up. Sure there were over 1,000 unread emails in my inbox, but I had gotten done the tasks that needed to get done and I could sit down and start looking through the pile of emails that have piled up and select the next tasks to tackle.
One of those emails, however, was from the lawyer for the foreclosure, so I felt I needed to write a little bit about that. Then, I got an IM in Second Life about the film shoot folks from TechSoup were doing in response to the Daily Show episode, Avatar Heroes. I’ve already written up my article about Avatar Heroes for SLNN.COM. I figured I should go and join the TechSoup folks. I participated in a dolphin avatar shape, and it strikes me that I need to form an organization, Dolphin Shaped Reporters of Second Life. Right now, I think it is just me and Rob Riggle. If there are any other Dolphin Shaped Reporters in Second Life, please let me know.
(You can see a few pictures I took at Avatar Heroes on Flickr.)
In other things, I’ve spent a bit of time working on a Drupal 6 installation. It has been fun mixing together pieces of the VotingAPI and Fivestar module, with the profile module and attempting to add Views into the mix. Unfortunately, Views doesn’t work well with VotingAPI in Drupal 6, so I had to roll a couple blocks of my own.
Soon, I will ran off to pick up our Community Supported Agriculture box and then take Fiona to her swimming lesson. When I get back, I need to do an interview or two in Second Life, so I guess the queue of unread emails will just have to grow a little more before I can dig into it.