Politics

Entries related to things political.

The Obama Effect on Open Source Software Development

Today, I was reading through emails on an open source developers’ list where there has been a contentious debate about different open source licensing agreements and the effect these agreements have on projects that interoperate with them. The discussion resides at the intersection of the geeky and the legal and can get very arcane.

So, I was very interested to read this comment in the midst of a heated discussion:

Ok. I took a deep breath. I watched the Obama speech, and that inspired me to be brutally honest with myself, and note an objection to my own impassioned argument.

(Categories: )

Connecticut Third Congressional District Obama Caucus

Approximately two hundred Sen. Barack Obama supporters gathered Wednesday evening at Career High School in New Haven, CT to elect delegates to the 2008 Democratic National Convention. Candidates for National Delegate needed to apply with the Secretary of States office by February 19th. These names were then provided to the Obama campaign for approval.

Twenty-four names were provided, twelve women and twelve men. Of these, the caucus could select two male delegates, two female delegates and one male alternate. The campaign provided it’s endorsed delegate slate.

Promptly at 7:30, Susan Voigt, chair of the New Haven Democratic Party, acting as temporary caucus chair called the meeting to order. She appointed a temporary secretary who read the call of caucus notice. Then, they elected a permanent chair. Ms. Voigt was the only person nominated to be permanent chair and was elected by acclaim. The temporary secretary was then elected to be permanent secretary.

Pledge of Allegiance was said, the rules were adopted and nominations were heard. The only candidates for male and female delegates presented were the official slate of the campaign, Mayor John DeStefano and Senator Martin Looney for the male delegates and State Representative Toni Walker and Obama 3rd CD Coordinator Jen Just for the female delegates. State Senator Ed Meyer nominated Sen. Looney. Yet the greatest applause went to the nomination speech for Jen Just. “When we talk about grassroots organizing, we talk about Jen Just.” Nominations were closed and the four delegates were elected.

The alternate delegate position saw the only drama of the evening. Allen Page was nominated for alternate delegate before the nomination for Jerry Weiner was made. After Jerry’s nomination, there was an attempt to nominate Jan Walker, but it was pointed out that the candidates needed to be male. With two candidates, there was a vote. It was a secret written ballot. Ballots were collected, the votes were counted and Jerry won the nomination as Alternate.

The delegates made their speeches and Jen Just got the final word, as well as the loudest applause. She spoke about how exciting it is to be part of something so big and acknowledged that the campaign, in and of itself, has been a big step forward for our country.

With the caucus over, many attendees hung out and chatted with old friends. Old New Haven political operatives mingled with folks from the New Haven Democracy for America group, people who had worked on Ned Lamont’s campaign and assorted bloggers from My Left Nutmeg. Jen Just commented about how four years ago, she never would have expected to end up becoming a delegate to the 2008 Democratic National Convention. For many attendees of the caucus, the past four years have been exciting, and the excitement leading up to the general election is great.

(Categories: )

Imputed Righteous

Hi, my name is Aldon, and I’m a racist. I’m also sexist, and have prejudices about anyone who doesn’t look like me, like those who are disabled.

Perhaps, I don’t meet your prejudices about racists. I don’t attend KKK meetings or burn crosses on lawns. I’m actually a liberal committed to fighting for an even playing field for everyone.

Yet still, late at night, as I walk down a dark street, I get worried if a young black man shows up on the street. I feel out of place when I go to a large black church and am one of the few white people in the congregation.

When I see women, I too often think about their physical attractiveness and not often enough about the whole woman, about their wisdom or intelligence, their ability to care for others. I’m fortunate. The woman that I am married to is both very attractive as well as very wise, intelligent, and caring.

When I see a person in a wheelchair or walking with a white cane, I too rarely think about how best too be with the person and too often feel ill at ease. As I’ve learned recently from my friends who are physically disabled, I probably appear to too many of them as just another belt buckle in the crowd. It simply doesn’t occur to me to sit down when I talk with a person in a wheelchair so we can look each other in the eyes.

Yet it seems that one of the things that is even stranger about my racism, sexism and other prejudices is that I admit them and am willing to look at them. I don’t suggest that racism or sexism is just someone else’s problem. It is all of our problems, and only by looking at and talking about our prejudices can we make our world a better place.

In the theological sense, this is, or should be, part of our confession of sin. We have not loved our neighbors as ourselves. In the liturgy, the confession is followed by the absolution where God’s forgiveness is pronounced. God imputes us righteous. God imputes us, no longer racists.

In the psychological sense, the same applies. By recognizing our shortcomings it becomes possible to address them. Simply by being aware of them, they lose some of their power.

It is with all of this that I look at Obama’s Rorschach speech. As a person who believes that I can become a better person by admitting my faults and that our country can become a more perfect union by looking at its faults, I thought Obama’s speech was great. I’ve been a lukewarm supporter of Sen. Obama. There are many issues that I disagree with him on. Yet, yesterday’s speech firmed up my support of Sen. Obama. It has been too long since we’ve had politicians willing to tackle serious issues.

Because of this damaged political environment, it is not surprising that political commentators, like Wolf Blitzer, can only see the speech as a pre-emptive strike against opponents’ attacks. Will Sen. Obama’s speech help enough American’s transcend the mud slinging politics that inspires people to read blogs, listen to talk radio or commentators on cable news networks, but damages our country?

My friendly Obama supporters are bound to yell, “Yes, it can!” I hope they are right; perhaps hope is all that we’ve got, and Obama has staked out the land of hope quite nicely. Yet this sense of hope takes me back to my religious underpinnings. I go back to the idea of being imputed righteous. God says we are better than the petty racism and sexism that messes up our daily lives, and in saying so, we become so.

Perhaps, Sen. Obama, like other politicians I respect are saying, “we are better than that”. We are better than the mudslinging. We are better than our petty racism and sexism. We are capable of loving our neighbors as ourselves. Perhaps, by saying so, they make us better. I sure hope so.

(Categories: )

More about the narrative

Since I wrote my blog post, Narrative and Public Opinion, I’ve stumbled across some other great articles. Melissa Harris-Lacewell has a great post entitled Our Jeremiah:Why Obama's pastor matters. (Hat tip: BEAUTIFUL, ALSO, ARE THE SOULS OF MY BLACK SISTERS).

Another great article is Frank Schaeffer’s Obama's Minister Committed "Treason" But When My Father Said the Same Thing He Was a Republican Hero. (Hat tip: Sojourner's Place).

Then to tie it all together, you should watch, listen to, or read, Sen. Obama’s speech from this morning about the sort of discussions we as a nation need to be having: "A More Perfect Union".

(Categories: )

Narratives and Public Opinion

“Crucify Him!” That is what we Episcopalians shouted out yesterday as we celebrated Passion Sunday, more commonly known as Palm Sunday. On Passion Sunday, we tell the story of the Passion. The story of the Passion isn’t just Jesus’ story. It isn’t just the story of people who lived two thousand years ago. It is all of our stories. It is the story of how fickle public opinion can be.

Jesus triumphantly enters Jerusalem as the crowds shout his praise. Yet Jesus turns over the tables of the money changes in the Temple and the Pharisees stir up these same crowds against Jesus. The crowds are easily turned against him. It is a story that we see over and over again.

Someone we place our hope in inspires us. But hope threatens the established order and those who thrive on the established order are threatened. They stir up the crowds, trying to convince people that the hope is not justified, that the person is too radical, too dangerous. Too many of us go along with the crowd whichever way it veers and public opinion is easily swayed.

Currently, the fascinating character in our national narrative is Barack Obama. Many people are shouting, “Obama, Obama, Blessed is he who comes in the name of peace.” They see Obama as a savior in our current political malaise. Yet just as the crowds were easily swayed two thousand years ago, so they are easily swayed today. Fox News, the modern day Pharisees have been breathlessly talking about the pastor at the church Obama attends.

Rev. Wright said in 2001 that the 9/11 attacks were like “chickens coming home to roost". This heresy, that America could ever do something bad that might make people dislike us, is almost as bad as having someone testify before the Chief Priests that Jesus said “I am able to destroy the temple of God and to rebuild it in three days.” So, the Chief Priests stirred up the crowd to call for Jesus’ crucifixion and now the Chief Television Commentators are stirring up the crowds against Barack Obama. It seems to be working. Political bloggers are quick to point out a new poll by Rassmussen saying Fifty-Six Percent Say Wright Makes Them "Less Likely" To Vote For Obama. This number is strikingly similar to the number of people that believed that Iraq was either directly involved in 9/11 attacks or gave substantial support.

So, how do we counter these fickle and misguided public opinions? Obama isn’t Jesus. He doesn’t have the options that Jesus did. Yet he does have the same stories, our common narrative dealing with misguided crowds and it is up to us to take the distortions of the modern day chief priest and return us to the truth.

How do we know truth? As a Christian, I believe it comes from the gift of discernment that God provides to those who seek it. Seeking discernment means listening to things we might not want to hear, to people who speak in ways that make us uncomfortable. I’ve often heard good preachers asking God to help them speak in ways so that their words might comfort the distressed and distress the comfortable.

I am not comfortable with all the people that Barack Obama listens to. I am not comfortable with all of his positions. Yet his willingness to listen to all sides of the debate and his willingness to carefully consider the viewpoints and seek discernment is something that is sorely lacking in our current political climate.

So, I will try to avoid being whipsawed by the modern day chief priests as they try to rile up public opinion against Barack Obama. I, like Sen. Obama, will seek discernment, and I hope you will too.

Syndicate content