Politics
The Jim Amann for Connecticut Governor 2010 Website
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 22:27Wednesday Evening, Jim Amann is expected to announce the formation of an exploratory committee for an exploratory committee for a 2010 run for governor. To say that he has an uphill battle may be an understatement. Already there is a Jim Amann for Connecticut Governor 2010 site up. It is worth checking out.
Random thoughts about delegates
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 21:27On one of the political mailing lists, there has been yet another discussion about the delegate selection process. I wrote an email about it which I thought I would copy to my blog:
The Good Fight
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 01/30/2008 - 10:34The news: Edwards to Quit Presidential Race.
My comment over on the Edwards Blog:
"Sen. Edwards has fought the good fight as a trial lawyer, as a Senator, in his battle against poverty and as a candidate for President. I am proud to have supported him and I will be proud to support him in whatever ways he feels it will be best for him to continue the good fight."
Politics and Governance
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 01/27/2008 - 16:58Recently on the Group Psychotherapy mailing list I am part of, the question came up about whether members could copy portions of emails for articles they were working on. This brought up some very good discussions about copyright, privacy, and ethics. Underlying all of this was the question of how rules get made. One person observed how the group was reluctant to establish rules. Another asked why rules the list needed rules, at which point the first person rested his case.
With Second Life, there seems to be similar resistance to effective rule making. As I noted in my SLNN Reporters Notebook, people claim that Daniel Linden said LL keeps its policies deliberately vague because, "as soon as they draw a solid line, someone will walk up to the line, lean over it and spit over it."
Are these, and other examples of difficulties establishing online rules a function of the online environment? In an online environment, the question of authority arises. Who has authority on a mailing list or in an online community? Is it the moderators, the company that runs the community, some combination? If it is some sort of combination, how is that worked out? To what extent should rules be established by direct democracy or by a representative democracy where rule makers are elected? What role does the absence of cues that we receive in face-to-face interactions play in people’s resistance to rule making online?
Is there something bigger going on here? Do people generally resist rule making, not wanting to be the disliked rule giver? Does this happen independent of the means of communication?
Next week, there will be an E-governance barcamp in Boston. Steven Clift has been working on e-democracy since 1994. Yet these efforts all seem to get drowned out with all the e-politics. It seems like everyone wants to argue the political points, but somehow e-governance initiatives don’t get the same amount of focus.
Does it make sense to have an experiential mailing list focused on e-governance? Can virtual environments like Second Life or Central Grid establish effective e-governance? How useful will the e-governance barcamp be? It will be fun to find out.
The Enabling Act of 2008
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Fri, 01/25/2008 - 20:41Here is the comment that I added on the Give em hell harry website concerning the reauthorization of the FISA act with retroactive immunity to Bush's corporate sponsors:
75 years ago on March 23, Germany's parliament passed the famous Enabling Act of 1933 which broadly expanded executive power and led to the formation of the Third Reich.
The current FISA legislation, while it is unlikely to bring about a dangerous totalitarian regime, is strikingly similar in that it sets supporters of the current executive branch above the law.
Those who love our country and our democracy must stand up and oppose the intelligence committee’s version of the FISA reauthorization, especially as it pertains to retroactive immunity for large corporate sponsors of the Bush administration.