Social Networks

Entries related to social networks, group psychology, anthropology, and really any of the social sciences.

Random Stuff

The dogs barked a lot last night, and I didn’t get much sleep. It has been a rainy day today, so I took it easy today. I did spend a bit of time online and so I’ll talk about a few different things that have been of interest.

One topic that has gotten a lot of attention recently is the eHarmony Video Bio of a young woman that likes cats. This has brought a great response by a guy that likes cheeseburgers. K LaMay’s Steamed Cheeseburgers has just opened up a new shop in Middletown, CT so I posted the cheeseburger video there.

Another topic today has been the Greenwich Mountain Lion. A mountain lion had been spotted in Greenwich CT. A Facebook page was set up for the mountain lion, and then came the sad news that it had been hit by a care in Milford, CT. Nonetheless, someone did suggest that the person who likes cats so much might be a good girl friend for the mountain lion.

I also spent a little time today playing in Empire Avenue. Essentially, it is a stock market game, where your earnings are based primarily on your social media activity. I’ve avoided it because I didn’t want it spamming up my Facebook wall, but it hasn’t been spammy, and it’s kind of interesting. Perhaps it will even bring a little more traffic to my site. Are you on Empire Avenue? If so, please consider buying stock in ahynes1. Also, please endorse my blog.

(Categories: )

Anthony Weiner and Andrew Breitbart: Sexting and Cyberbullying

We all look at the news from our own contexts and through our own filters. I’ve been thinking about this a bit recently in terms of the recent news about Congressman Anthony Weiner sending lewd pictures over the internet. On the Social Media Health Network, there has been a discussion about this which seems to focus on public relations and the use of Twitter. It is an important way of looking at what has happened and relates well with my job at the Community Health Center. Yet I have a slightly different, but related framework to look at this with.

Back in March, the American Academy of Pediatricians released a clinical report, The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families. One of the key recommendations of the report is that

the AAP encourages all pediatricians to increase their knowledge of digital technology so that they can have a more educated frame of reference for the tools their patients and families are using, which will aid in providing timely anticipatory media guidance as well as diagnosing media-related issues should they arise.

The press release about the clinical report has this to say:

because tweens and teens have a limited capacity for self-regulation and are susceptible to peer pressure, they are at some risk as they engage in and experiment with social media, according to the report. They can find themselves on sites and in situations that are not age-appropriate, and research suggests that the content of some social media sites can influence youth to engage in risky behaviors. In addition, social media provides venues for cyberbullying and sexting, among other dangers

It appears that it is not only tweens and teens that have a limited capacity for self-regulation. Some would suggest it applies to most politicians and media personalities as well.

A second part of the framework I’m looking at Congressman Weiner’s behavior from is Marc Prensky’s Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. The key idea is that adolescents today have grown up in a digital culture. They are digital natives. They are used to thinking about everything happening online. They may still make bad choices or not fully understand the possible consequences of their online actions, but they are growing up digitally.

Older adults have not grown up in a digital world, and are digital immigrants.

As Digital Immigrants learn – like all immigrants, some better than others – to adapt to their environment, they always retain, to some degree, their "accent," that is, their foot in the past. The “digital immigrant accent” can be seen in such things as turning to the Internet for information second rather than first.

Congressman Weiner has not grown up in a world where cyberbullying and sexting are normal parts of adolescence, and I suspect that those who have grown up digitally may see the recent news very differently from digital immigrants.

Congressman Weiner was a popular guy in the progressive clique. He participated in sexting. A cyberbully from the teaparty clique, Andrew Breitbart, did what cyberbullies do. They capitalize on a mistake their enemies have made and spread it around the internet as widely as possible. It isn’t a lot different than what is happening in high schools around the country, except that these people are congressmen and media personalities.

We need better education about the dangers of sexting and cyberbullying. Apparently, we need it not only for tweens and teens but also for Congressmen and media personalities.

(Categories: )

Social Music

Music, like other forms of media is very social, from the mix tapes of my youth to the social media tools of today. This weekend, I started thinking about where we are with social media. For a long time, I’ve used Pandora and Last.fm I’ve liked tools that have mashed up Last.fm and Pandora as well as listed music I’ve played on my N900 on Last.fm. However, there have been some interesting developments since I started playing with Pandora and Last.fm. I just wish I could find an app that would scrobble the tunes I’m listening to on a Pandora android app to Last.fm

What got me thinking about this is over the weekend, I noticed a lot of my friends posting YouTube music videos on their Facebook Wall. I started adding them to a playlist on YouTube. With that, I can then play the playlist on my cellphone or on my Roku Player. (Yes, I loaded the YouTube Private Channel before it got shutdown, and I hope to use it until Roku and Google work out their issues and make YouTube fully supported).

Of course, I started thinking about how it would be nice if I could just click on the video to more easily add it to my Social Music playlist on YouTube, similar to the way you can get Last.fm to save information about music you’ve listened to or easily like songs on Pandora. Perhaps someone will come up with a nice way of doing this.

I also took a quick look at Vevo. So far, I am very unimpressed with it. It won’t allow me to upload my avatar and won’t save a bunch of my settings. Most of the music seems way to mainstream for my tastes, and I couldn’t find a way to associate my online profile to the Vevo Android app.

Meanwhile, music is moving to the cloud. The Last.fm app on the Android doesn’t seem to scrobble music from Amazon’s MP3 cloud. Perhaps that will get fixed at some time. However, Amazon’s MP3 cloud really hasn’t caught my attention. I’ve thought about experimenting with Ubuntu One, but it costs $3.99 a month to have mobile access, and it just isn’t worth that much.

So, what are you doing to share music?

Conference Overload! #InternetWeek #pdf2011 #weitzman #chc2011 #gsmamha #healthapps

Well, next week, is Internet Week in New York (#InternetWeek). There are lots of interesting events as part of Internet Week, and last year, I spent almost all of Internet Week in New York. At the start of Internet Week, there is also Personal Democracy Forum (#pdf2011). In the early days, I used to always make it to PDF, but I haven’t been in a few years. Also, as part of Internet Week is the Digital Publishing and Advertising Conference (#dpac). I almost always make it to that conference.

However, this year, I will be at the 2011 Weitzman Symposium, Designing the Moment: Remodeling Health Care (#weitzman). Of course, if I could clone myself and be at multiple places at the same time, I’d really like to be at Community Health Centres: Acting Today, Shaping Tomorrow (#chc2011). They have a neat Social Media Guide for their conference.

If we could throw in teleportation, I’d be at the Mobile Health Summit(#gsmahma) in Capetown, South Africa. If all of this wasn’t enough, I just learned about The Health Data Initiative Forum (#healthapps) being organized by the Institute of Medicine. They are doing something interesting. They are streaming it live and having viewing parties. You can get more information at Calling All Health Innovators: June 9th Health Data-Palooza Live.

So, I’ll catch pieces of what I can here and there.

Doing the Numbers: Dunbar, Klout, Peerindex, and Patient Panels

I’ve long been interested in Dunbar’s Number, an estimated maximum number of people that a person can maintain a stable relationship with. (See Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Put simply, our minds are only wired to be able to maintain relationships with around 150 people at a time.

Some people have suggested that sites like Twitter, where I currently follow about 2900 people and have over 3,350 followers, Facebook, where I am approaching 2000 friends, and even LinkedIn where I’m approaching 700 connections is a reason to rethink Dunbar’s number. Perhaps technology gives us the ability to maintain broader relationships than our neocortex permits.

However, a recent article, Validation of Dunbar's number in Twitter conversations explores the nature of twitter conversations.

We find that users can entertain a maximum of 100-200 stable relationships in support for Dunbar's prediction. The "economy of attention" is limited in the online world by cognitive and biological constraints as predicted by Dunbar's theory.

Basically, they analyze a mass of tweets and find that as the number of people a person is connected with on twitter, the number of people they regularly communicate with starts dropping off somewhere between when they reach 100 and 200 people. They conclude

In this paper we show that social networks did not change human social capabilities. We analyze a large dataset of Twitter conversations collected across six months involving millions of individuals to test the theoretical cognitive limit on the number of stable social relationships known as Dunbar's number. We found that even in the online world cognitive and biological constraints holds as predicted by Dunbar's theory limiting users social activities.

I think they are significantly overstating things. If anything, their paper shows that for a very large sample of uses of a particular social network the human behavior around conversations did not significantly change as the result of using the technology. The lack of observed change in a behavior in a specific time with a specific tool does not mean that capabilities haven’t or are not changing. It may well be that there is something about Dunbar’s number that is immutable, even with the use of technology. This paper just doesn’t show it.

As I thought about it, I also thought about things like Klout and PeerIndex; tools aimed to measure influence. Online influence varies greatly. This might be because online communications isn’t just conversational, but there is a broadcast element as well. If we are in fact limited by the number of people we can converse with, it is an interesting topic for people interested in social media, especially those focused on the value of conversations over broadcasts.

Another thought that I had was about how many patients a typical doctor sees during a year. Numbers that I read suggest that the best ‘patient panel’ for a primary care doctor is in the range of 1800-2000 patients, way past Dunbar’s number. Should our conversations on social media be more like a broadcast? An informal conversation? A Doctors’ Appointment?

What do you think?

Syndicate content