Politics

Entries related to things political.

Two Donor Lists, Ben Smith and Don Imus

Yesterday, as I was creating the fundraising maps, I spent a bit of time thumbing through the FEC filings. There are a lot of rich people that have donated a lot of money to the Presidential campaigns. In politics, these are the ‘high dollar donors’ and the fundraising teams carefully nurture them. They get the maxed out donation, and then try to get friends of the high dollar donors to also max out.

Then, there are the ‘low dollar donors’. They are the people contributing $25 via ActBlue. They get nice emails, and maybe a mass mailing or two. They get tallied up as statistics on the quarterly reports, but don’t get any wine or hors d’oeuvres, unless they volunteer to help out at a high dollar event.

Two donor lists, two Americas. Some of us try to be in both worlds. We volunteer for high dollar events. If we are fortunate, we max out, and still get involved in nitty gritty volunteer activities. I would love to see campaigns try to bridge these two worlds.

It makes me think of Joni Mitchell’s song, “The Boho Dance”, where she talks about how when she was “working cheap”, doing the Boho Dance, yet always having well pressed jeans and “a little lace along the seams”. She contrasts that with the “a lady in a Paris dress With runs in her nylons”. Yeah, many of us straddle two Americas, whether it be two Americas of political donations, two Americas of artistic endeavor, or some other bifurcation of our country. Some of us want to bring the two Americas together. Others want to keep them apart

Don't you get sensitive on me
'Cause I know you're just too proud
You couldn't step outside the Boho dance now
Even if good fortune allowed

It isn’t just the “artists in noble poverty” that perpetuate the Boho dance. It makes good news copy. The sort of writing that Ben Smith is doing at the Politico only serves to further the rift between the two Americas, instead of bring them together. It serves to feed the divisiveness and further damage our country.

As I read about Virginia Tech, it struck me about how horrible things hit people independent of their economic status, or which America they belong to. As I read about psychological first aid, I thought about some of the ‘core actions’:

To respond to contacts initiated by affected persons, or initiate contacts in a non-intrusive, compassionate, and helpful manner.
To enhance immediate and ongoing safety, and provide physical and emotional comfort.
To calm and orient emotionally-overwhelmed/distraught survivors.
To offer practical help to the survivor in addressing immediate needs and concerns.
To help establish brief or ongoing contacts with primary support persons or other sources of support, including family members, friends, and community helping resources.
To provide information (about stress reactions and coping) to reduce distress and promote adaptive functioning

Whether or not you are a trained mental health professional providing psychological first aid, or you are simply a citizen concerned about the welfare of our country, it seems like these core actions are probably things that we would all be better off doing more of.

It is much better than trying to stir things up about how much a presidential candidate spends on a haircut, or calling basketball stars ‘nappy-headed hos’.

(Categories: )

Fundraising maps

The Des Moines Register has an interesting article today, looking at how the candidates did in fundraising in Iowa. Romney led the Republicans and Edwards led the Democrats. So, I thought it would be interesting to see how things look in a few other states.

In New Hampshire, Obama edged out Clinton $49,971 to $45,500. Edwards was third at $25,100. In South Carolina, Edwards far outstripped the competition $186,109 to Clinton’s $36,100 and Obama’s $31,810. Richardson and Biden did relatively well there with $22,000 and $13,000 respectively. In Nevada, it was very strongly Clinton, $317,000 to Obama’s $63,530, Edwards $45,500 and Richardson’s $32,650.

Home states when for their native sons and daughter. In New York, Clinton raised $7,034,167. In Illinois, Obama raised $3,756,756. In North Carolina, Edwards raised $1,421,149. In New Mexico, Richardson raised $2,799,017. The only other state that Richardson was the top fundraiser was Arizona where he raised $71,325. Dodd led in Connecticut with $1,006,410. Biden led in Delaware with $279,000. Those were the only two states where Dodd and Biden led.

Using a neat little Web 2.0 tool to mashup states, it was very easy to create maps showing where Obama, Clinton, and Edwards lead.

Obama:

Clinton

Edwards

I’ll leave the interpretation of these maps as an exercise for the readers.

Note about the methodology: I downloaded the files from these candidate from the FEC website. It was a fairly long and tedious process so I didn’t bother with Kucinich or Gravel. I might go back and check them later. Using the Filter Table functionality, I extracted the SA17A records for type IND, which I understand to be the individual donations. I then used a pivot table to break it down on a state by state basis showing what I understand to be the amount available for the primary. I then combined the individual pivot tables into a single table for comparison. My numbers checked out with the Des Moines Register’s numbers, so I know that at least they used a similar methodology.
(Cross posted to Greater Democracy)

(Categories: )

A coherent vision

(The following is a comment I posted DailyKos, in response to Jeffrey Feldman's post.)

Jeffrey, thank you for your summary of the different viewpoints. I think it illustrates some aspects of a coherent Democratic vision that is too easy to lose during a primary.

In many ways, Edwards ties together all the other positions.

"We can see in this statement that Edwards is presenting his vision that I would call "action now," "

It ties into the greater theme of “limits of Presidential authority”.

(Categories: )

Shield Laws

Last May, Connecticut passed a reporter’s shield law, and the law came into effect on October 1st. There are now over thirty states with shield laws in effect and Massachusetts is currently working on a shield law.

At the New England News Forum conference on Saturday, shield laws were a hot topic. The panel, “Does journalism--or blogging--merit a shield?” explored this is detail. Jeffrey Newman, a lawyer at Prince Lobel Glovsky and Tye has been leading the charge to bring shield laws to Massachusetts and moderated the session.

(Categories: )

Even the Costa Ricans want universal broadband

Back in March, Gov. Jim Douglas of Vermont addressed the Freedom to Connect conference in Washington, DC. I wrote about his talk briefly in a previous blog post. David Weinberger, Tom Evslin, Steve Smith and others have all written about the talk. It was a pretty geek audience and Gov. Douglas showed that he could keep up with the geeks.

At lunch at the New England News Forum conference, Gov. Douglas spoke to a crowd much more interested in the implications of his initiative to media and politics. Lynne Lupien live blogged some of his talk, and I want to add my own insights here.

Back in 2003 and early 2004, I followed around a previous Vermont Governor as he spoke about his vision for our country. My wife and I heard the stump speech so many times that we could recite it pretty well, ourselves. So, it was no surprise when I heard Gov. Douglas speak about the four doctors from Boston. They needed to be able to get back to their hospital within four hours of an emergency. They went up to Sugarbush to ski, only to find that there wasn’t cell phone coverage there. They said they could not ski there again, until that problem was fixed.

He told the story of a business in northeastern Vermont where there was no broadband access that was now being required by its suppliers to place its orders online. To these stories he added the public safety aspect, mentioning the story of a Brooklyn, NY man who froze to death when is car went off the road in the Adirondacks in an area where there was no cell phone coverage. He spoke of the ‘creative economy’, noting that Vermont has more authors per capita than any other state. Yet artists living in Vermont suffer from having to send images of their paintings to galleries over dialup connections.

(Categories: )
Syndicate content