Media
New Government Meets New Media
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 03/10/2010 - 15:23One of the interesting discussions at Gov 2.0 Camp New England last weekend was about New Government meeting New Media. How do the two inter-relate? How should people in government use new media to more effectively serve the community? How should people in government relate to bloggers, citizen journalists and others in New Media?
SB 365 – An Act Concerning the Posting of Public Agency Minutes and Legal Notices on the Internet Web Site of a Municipality
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 03/08/2010 - 11:49Last year, I wrote a blog post about bills before the Government Administrations and Elections Committee of the CT General Assembly. One bill would have delayed the implementation of a requirement that municipalities post their minutes on their websites. Another bill would have allowed municipalities to post legal notices on their websites instead of in local papers. The issue of legal notices has come up again this year, and I’ve recently written about it in public notices and covering the news and in Lebanon CT rejects budget ordinance.
In my blog post from last year, I noted that I found it interesting that people who supported delaying the requirement that municipalities post their minutes online were the same people that supported allowing municipalities to post legal notices.
This year, the bill looks much better. It links the two together in an appropriate manner:
Any town, city or borough that is in compliance with the provisions of subsection (a) of section 1-225, as amended by this act, concerning the posting of minutes may post any advertisement of a legal notice described in subsection (a) of this section in a conspicuous place on such town's, city's or borough's Internet web site in lieu of insertion of such advertisement in a daily or weekly newspaper.
Today, there is the public hearing about the proposed bill. I’m told that the publisher of the Willimantic Chronicle is testifying against the bill. I’m not particularly impressed with their website, but they do have a link to a very interesting website, Connecticut Public Notices. This site appears to aggregate public notices published in newspapers from across the state and make them easy to search. The site is part of MyPublicNotices which is a unit of Legacy.com. “Founded in 1998, Legacy.com is backed by several individual investors and the Tribune Company”.
It will be interesting to see how this develops. I think there is benefit to municipalities being able to publish their legal notices online. I had previously written:
Perhaps instead of simply doing away with the requirement that municipalities publish notices in local papers, we should allow them to publish them on online sites as well, providing the online sites get sufficient traffic. Municipalities that have vibrant websites might be able to use their own websites. Municipalities with lackluster websites that do not attract traffic might find it more efficient to post their notices on some of the online news sites that are rapidly growing in the state.
The language of SB 365 seems to move us in that direction, but other issues remain, such as with this loss of revenue for local papers, how will local news coverage be supported? Will there be sufficient tools to aggregate the public notices? Is there the possibility of an open standard for posting such notices and open software to facilitate posting such notices? Whatever happens, SB 365 seems to be just another small step in the long journey of news organizations and municipalities adopting to the age of the Internet.
#saveabc7 versus Cablevision and HR 5469
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 03/07/2010 - 11:35Yesterday morning as I surfed my daily allotment of blogs, I notice one recurring advertisement. It was for SaveABC7. Clicking on the ad, I found that Cablevision was entering into a new fracas similar to what happened with Food Channel and HGTV earlier this year. That three week dispute with Scripps was over the amount that Cablevision must pay per subscriber to carry the channels.
This morning channel 7 on Cablevision had a message from the cable company saying that ABC7 was off the air during the current dispute. It appears as if a similar dispute is now being fought out over what Cablevision must pay to carry ABC7.
The media landscape continues to evolve as people argue about creation and distribution of video content. Yet this is not a discussion that the average subscriber needs to be involved in. In fact, using subscribers as pawns in such discussions seems, at best, unfair.
To address this, the Energy and Technology Committee of the Connecticut General Assembly is considering bill HR 5469 – An Act Concerning Cable Subscriber Rights. The proposed bill has the following language:
No certified competitive video service provider, holder of a certificate of cable franchise authority or community antenna television company, as defined in section 16-1 of the general statutes, shall withdraw programming from its channel lineup during the contract renewal process for such programming. A violation of this section shall be deemed an unfair trade practice in violation of subsection (a) of section 42-110b of the general statutes.
If you are tired of being used as a pawn in a high dollar game of who video content is distributed contact your State Legislator to discuss the bill.
Juxtaposing Blog Posts and Museum Exhibitions: A Deconstruction of a Family Trip to the Whitney Biennial
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Thu, 03/04/2010 - 10:13”Yes, of course, if it’s fine tomorrow.” Said Mrs. Ramsay. “But you’ll have to be up with the lark,” she added.
Miranda is home from college for winter break. Not completely home, she’s staying at her mother’s house, and she has her own life now. She’s studying art and would rather spend time having lunch with gallery owners in New York than dinner with her dad and his family in Connecticut. Of course the best of all worlds might be if she could go museum hopping with Fiona, Kim and I in New York.
Kim had to work, but we decided to take Fiona out of school for the day. She has been longing to see her half-sister and a trip to the Whitney Biennial could be a great educational experience. Unlike Mrs. Ramsay in Virginia Woolf’s ‘To The Lighthouse’, I did not expect Miranda to be up with the lark, and we planned a late morning train.
What a lark! What a plunge! My thoughts shifted to Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. Mrs. Dalloway said she would buy the flowers herself. I discovered Virginia Woolf in my college days and fell in love with her writing. She captures a world from a viewpoint so different than I had developed growing up on a small farm in Western Massachusetts and that diversity of viewpoints I found so intriguing. Slowly, I grew out of my fascination for the outsiders that Hermann Hesse portrayed to the crazy older men of other great literature. What did Mr. Ramsay struggle with as he tried to get beyond ‘R’? What opium induced visions did Augustus Carmichael see as he shuffled past Mrs. Ramsay, reminding her of the inadequacy of human relationships.
Some one had blundered.
As I thought of these characters, various idealists from Anton Chekhov’s plays came to mind. Marcel Proust joined the fray and the opening line, For a long time I used to go to bed early comes to mind. Fiona went to bed early before the great trip to the museum, and my thoughts mingled together into strange dreamlike sequences as I drifted off that night.
The train ride in was uneventful. Fiona was full of excitement about seeing her big sister. Miranda was full of excitement about seeing the Biennial. I settled into my role of the crazy old uncle. I had thought about titling my blog post something like, “Having a Crazy Uncle for a Dad”. As we talked, I asked Fiona what she thought ‘art’ was. I explained that it sounds like a very simple question, but really, it is very complicated. She admitted it was complicated and started talking about things that are painted. I asked if a painted house, car, or mailbox is art. As we talked, Fiona decided that everything was art and moved on to other topics.
Is this blog post art? How does it compare to the video of people talking about America projected on to the cracked windshield of a 1960s era ambulance? What is the purpose of art? Miranda was less interested in those installations that were making some sort of political statement. If she were older and more cynical, I could hear her deriding anything except art for art’s sake. Yet what is the ‘sake’ of ‘art’? Towards the end of the exhibit, we looked at a painting by Mark Rothko and Miranda talked about how he resisted his work being called abstract and berated using words like ‘juxtaposed’ to describe it. We joked about so many of those little write-ups on the walls using words like juxtaposed and deconstructed. I remember the old joke about people who can’t do, teach, and wandered if something similar applied to these art write-ups. Those who can’t do art, write little descriptions for the walls of museums.
At one point during the visit, I glanced out of one of the rare windows in the Whitney to the scene outside. I remembered the old homeless man that Miranda and I had seen dumpster diving at Grand Central. What is art? What is its purpose? What do we learn by juxtaposing the homeless man against the Whitney?
More immediately, what am I doing here, writing my blog post about going to the Whitney with two of my daughters? How do blogs fit into the greater picture? Where does other technology fit in?
For me, perhaps some of it comes back to the crazy old men who look at life a little bit different. Perhaps I’m becoming one of them. Perhaps, I might even cause someone else to stop, if even just for a moment, and look at life a little bit differently. I know that my experience at the Whitney has caused me to look around a little more closely, and I hope it has had a similar effect for my daughters, as well as for others that visit it.
Lebanon CT Rejects Budget Ordinance
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 03/02/2010 - 12:51Yesterday, I received a phone call from a Lebanon, CT resident concerned about a town meeting that had been scheduled for last night. The purpose of the meeting was to ‘Consider and act upon an Ordinance providing for the separate consideration of the General Town Budget and the Board of Education Budget’. However, last November during the municipal elections there had been a ballot question asking if the town should enact such an ordinance. If it was already voted on in November, why was there this special meeting?
Lebanon is a small town in eastern Connecticut. The population was just under seven thousand at the 2000 Census. In 2005, there were about 4,800 voters in the town. The local paper is the Norwich Bulletin from the city 12 miles to the southeast.
Last November, there was a ballot question about whether or not the town should enact an ordinance separating the town budget from the education budget. Prior to the vote, there were a couple of informatory meetings to discuss the pros and cons of the proposal, but only a few people showed up for the meetings.
According to the town clerk’s office, this ballot question received 954 yes votes and 391 no votes. However, this question did not have the language of an ordinance and was only informatory to the town boards. Based on the results, a town meeting was scheduled to vote on the ordinance.
On February 18th, the Board of Selectmen posted a Legal Notice of the Special Town Meeting. It was posted in the Norwich Bulletin, on the town website and at town hall. Still, many people did not know about the meeting or about the issue.
Last night, around 150 people showed up for the town meeting. After a discussion of the proposed ordinance there was a paper ballot where 101 people voted against the ordinance and 49 voted for it.
It may well be that there is something about this in the Norwich Bulletin, but my search online turned up nothing. Previously, I’ve written about Public Notices and Covering the News. In order for ballot questions and votes on proposed ordinances at town meetings to be meaningful, voters need to know about the town meetings as well as understand the issues they are voting on. I suspect that many of my friends could argue strong points on either side of whether or not a town ordinance to separate the town budget from the education budget would be a good thing. Unfortunately, this debate did not seem to happen in any visible manner in Lebanon. Either people didn’t know, didn’t care, or couldn’t attend the town meeting.
Yesterday, Chris Powell, posed the question, What are legals worth? in a column in the Journal Inquirer. He writes:
In determining whether the legal notice requirement gives value, the value of news reporting about government has to be considered, since that is also what legal notice advertising pays for and what will diminish if that advertising diminishes. Right now Connecticut's newspapers report about state and local government all out of proportion to the public's interest, apparently in the belief that the public should be more civic-minded than it is and that newspapers should strive to compensate for the long decline in civic virtue.
I do believe that newspapers should strive to compensate for the long decline in civic virtue. They need to do it for the good of the country as well as for their own good. He is right in noting that newspapers report about local government disproportionately to the apparent public interest. Yet there may be a chicken and egg problem here. Why are people interested, or not interested in something? Does some of it have to do with whether or not it is being reported on?
Unfortunately, despite the legal notice about the town meeting, the Norwich Bulletin does not appear to have covered the event and there was low turnout. Yes, Mr. Powell is right, the value of news reporting about government needs to be considered, and in this case I have to question the value of the legal notice in the Norwich Bulletin and the value of any reporting it might have generated.