Personal
The impossible heap
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 05/27/2007 - 16:31In Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert Pirsig differentiates between what he calls ‘Classical understanding’ and ‘Romantic understanding’, in part, by using the illustration of a handful of sand.
Classical understanding is concerned with the piles and the basis for sorting and interrelating them. Romantic understanding is directed toward the handful of sand before the sorting begins. Both are valid ways of looking at the world although irreconcilable with each other.
What has become an urgent necessity is a way of looking at the world that does violence to neither of these two kinds of understanding and unites them into one.
I don’t know if Pirsig had the tradition of making mandala’s out of sand in mind when he wrote these words, since it seems as if such monks have united these understandings.
These mandala’s made the news this week when a young boy danced in such a mandala at Union Station in Kansas City, MO. (See Boy Destroys Monks' Sand Art At Union Station, for more details.)
It reminded me of a skit I saw back in college. The announcer said ‘REALISM’, and a man came out a mimed unsuccessfully trying to pick up some weights. The announcer then said ‘IDEALISM’, and the man mimed picking up the weights with ease. The two were repeated a couple times, and then the announcer said ‘EXISTENTIALISM’. The man mimed carrying the barbells over his shoulder, turning around and knocking over ‘REALISM’, hearing the noise, turning the other direction to see what had happened and knocking over ‘IDEALISM’.
Was this what happened with the young boys dance? No, part of the tradition of the sand mandala’s is to sweep up the sand, and put it in a nearby river. It is a reminder that nothing lasts forever. The boy was bringing that reminder a little bit ahead of schedule.
It makes me think of the great poem by W.H. Auden, Musee des Beaux Arts,
How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:
Is there something we can learn about our best-laid plans, about how nothing lasts forever, or about suffering? I find the comments to the article about this on Anderson Cooper’s blog
On parenting:
“His mom should have had more of an eye on him and more control over him! Some people just let their kids run wild and don't pay enough attention to them!!”
“That little boy spent some minutes away from his Mother, and I bet she'd be the first one to b*tch and moan if he was snatched by someone looking to hurt a little kid. Both should be punished.”
“Good parenting there, mom. Nice way to teach accountability by picking up the kid and skedaddling.”
On the media:
“I mean really, do you feel these topics are worthy the attention of the populance?
It seems to me there are many more worthy topics in the news at present. Like for instance, the passing of the War Funding Bill, Senator Clinton's No Vote on the contentious Iraq supplemental bill, the upcoming meeting with Iran and World Diplomats, US Aid Arrives in Lebanon, North Korea test missiles, et al.”
To a person that seems to get some of the message of the art and the incident:
When someone hurts us we should write it in sand so the winds of forgiveness can erase it away but, when someone does something good for us we should write it in stone where no wind can ever erase it.
One final quote to pull it all together:
Ryokan, a Zen master, lived the simplest kind of life in a little hut at the foot of a mountain. One evening a thief visited the hut only to discover there was nothing to steal.
Kyokan returned and caught him. "You may have come a long way to visit me, " he told the prowler, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please take my clothes as a gift."
The thief was bewildered. He tool the clothes and slunk away.
Ryokan sat naked, watching the moon. "Poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could give him this beautiful moon."
Communion
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Sun, 05/27/2007 - 02:17Sunday morning, very bright, I read Your book by colored light
That came in through the pretty window picture.
One of the most important rules about having a successful blog, all the experts say, is to have a clear niche. Write about one thing, stay on message and keep your focus. If you’re going to write about technology, stay with technology. If you’re going to write about progressive politics, stay with that. The same goes for religion, personal blogging, etc. The rationale for this seems to be the fear that strikes many media educators about what is happening to the way people consume media.
More and more, people are searching the web for viewpoints that match their own. As a progressive, I can go out and find other people writing from a progressive viewpoint. As a Christian, I can find people writing from a Christian viewpoint. The more different viewpoints a write brings to their blog, the more they will narrow the audience, the theory goes.
Yet the increasing Balkanization of our media consumption is something the media educators fear. Take a look at EPIC. How do we deal with the dangers of an increasingly Balkanized society of media consumers?
For me, the first line of defense is rejecting the adage to keep my blog confined to a narrow niche. Instead, I will write about politics, about being a husband, a father, a brother and a son. I will write about media and technology and even religion.
I started blogging several years ago as many of my friends from a different online community moved from a synchronous text based programmable game-oriented chat room to blogging. I spent a lot of time at a place called LambdaMOO. The space was created around the space of the originators house. I think a house is a great metaphor for that sort of space, as well as for the space that a blog creates, and I named the Orient Lodge Blog after the house I was living in when I started the blog.
In the dining room, there is a picture of Gov. Dean holding my daughter at one rally or another. It sits next to a crucifix and some crafts that my wife made to liven up and add a touch of hominess to the dining room.
At our table, we have had a wide variety of guests, political, religious, business leaders, and technologists. There has been great food and great laughter. There has been communion. I seek to share this communion online, knowing that if the experts are right, I will drive away everyone who doesn’t match my unique and eclectic views, yet believing that we are better than that. That we can sit down with people
So the Christians and the Pagans sat together at the table,
Finding faith and common ground the best that they were able,
And where does magic come from? I think magic's in the learning,
So, I hope that my gifted pagan anime-loving lesbian readers, by Buddhist technology activist readers, my atheist progressive political readers, my cancer surviving southern Christian mommy readers, my retired conservative economic professor readers, and a wide range of other readers can all sit at the table and share ideas.
(Note: Lyrics are Hymn by Peter, Paul and Mary, and The Christians and the Pagans, by Dar Williams. It is my belief that both are protected by copyrights and the use falls within the best practices in fair use, specifically, “quoting copyrighted works of popular culture to illustrate an argument or point.” For more information on Fair use, please check out The Center for Social Media’s webpage, Copyright and Fair Use.)
Harold’s Risky Crayon
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Mon, 05/21/2007 - 20:19A week and a half ago, I was tagged by Rod with a Thinking Blogger Award. Part of the game is to go out and tag five other bloggers that make you think. Instead of rattling off five blogs when I got the award, I thought I would spend some time, try to find the right recipients, and then put up my post.
This evening, I stumbled across a blog post that made me sit back and think, so I’ll use of the first of my five nominations for Oh, The Joys. In Overthinking Harold's Purple Nightmare she thinks about Harold’s Purple Crayon in a manner radically different from my own thoughts. On top of that, when I stopped by she was breaking 50 comments on the post, most of them echoing her thoughts.
I wondered if it is a chromosome thing. She spoke about this in a previous blog post where her husband amuses her son by bouncing underwear off of a ceiling fan
K threw, the teeny tiny underwear, they caught on the ceiling fan blade, they spun around...
...and they flew down and SMACKED The Mayor right in the head.
K's manly victory dance ensued.
The Mayor laughed.
I shook my head and thought, "that is one odd chromosome."
On further investigation, however, I wonder if it is a Mason Dixon line sort of thing, or something about risk taking. You see, Kim loved the Harold stories as a child, and reads them to Fiona, who also loves them. Kim, Fiona and I are what I believe is called in the south, damnyahnkees.
Wordless Wednesday
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Wed, 05/16/2007 - 13:30Keeping Personal Democracy Personal
Submitted by Aldon Hynes on Tue, 05/15/2007 - 11:50This Friday, I will attend Personal Democracy Forum. This is its fourth year, and I’ve made it every year so far. In 2004, I had been doing a lot of volunteer work with Gov. Dean’s Presidential campaign. When Gov. Dean ended his campaign, my wife decided to run for State Representative and I was her campaign manager. Democracy was all very personal to me.
By 2006, I had gone from a volunteer through being the paid BlogMaster for John DeStefano’s gubernatorial campaign and then technology coordinator for Ned Lamont’s U.S. Senate bid. It seemed like all of my friends from the Dean campaign had gone through similar, or even more profound changes as they all worked in professional roles with campaigns or with vendors servicing campaigns. Somehow, it all started to seem a bit less personal.
People that lived in Connecticut became records in one database or another. They became donors, volunteers, and voters. They were categorized, high dollar, or low dollar, super volunteers, or volunteers that love to offer advice, but not work. They became likely voters, ones and fives.
After last year’s conference, I spent a bit of time pondering how to keep Personal Democracy Forum personal. My thoughts never solidified enough to become a blog post. Thoughts revolved around the contrast between broadcast politics and networked politics. After all, with broadcast politics, the viewer is nothing but a viewer to be categorized, but with networked politics, everyone is an important part of the network, right?
Well, as I listen to so many online campaign strategists, I wonder how many people are really recognizing the importance of every node on the network, other than its ability to generate cash or message.
Perhaps some of this comes from a hierarchical view of networks, sending out messages to various nodes, but not encouraging communication back, or lateral communication between nodes. Or, perhaps, it comes from looking at the nodes on the network as nodes.
We are talking about real living people. People who have feelings, hopes, desires, fears; people trying to figure out how to pay for health insurance, college, or even food and housing. We are talking about people worried about a sick relative, morning the death of a loved one or celebrating a new birth, a graduation or a wedding.